- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 3,411
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
- Uni Grad
- 2013
I played over 100 hours cod4 these hols but um shh.
I TAKE HSC VERY SERIOUSLY K!
I TAKE HSC VERY SERIOUSLY K!
I left half my grammer skills in examination roomSeriously, no offence to those who wrote 2. Unlucky on your part. But I had to work hard to cut out one ORT it tied in really well with the other one. So i will be so annoyed if they let it slide cause my essay would have been much better with 2 ORT's.
Does anyone know what will happen?
Yeah same. I would have had a better essay with 2 textsNot to be slack or anything but I hope people who did only one related text will have an advantage over those who didn't. Or maybe just don't consider the second text of the others.
I mean people like me actually sacrificed some of our good related text material. It would be unfair if they simply accepted two?
"Demonstrate how your prescribed text and ONE other related text of your own choosing represent this interpretation of belonging"Did two texts, wrote 11 pages, hopefully i've got enough stuff in there to get A range
and to be fair it did say "ONLY one"
it said "ONE"
and yes, while it is in capitals, there isnt AS much emphasis on it as there could have been, so i reckon if you did them well enough, synthesized everything and followed the rubric you'll be sweet
:d"demonstrate how your prescribed text and one other related text of your own choosing represent this interpretation of belonging"
err, not sure how you can twist that to make it sound like two. In any way. Ever.
Synthesizing skills? You don't need skills to integrate two texts : Text a Text b Text a Text b etc, repeat, Profit.I was talking to my English teacher about it and he said that since people could write far better essays with two texts they were testing our writing and synthesising skills. He rekons that people who used more than two weren't showing these skills as much and weren't obeying the instructions so they would have a hard time getting 11/15... it's a shame for them but I guess they brought it on themselves...
+1. Plus the question specifically said ONE. I don't think it's fair for people who actually did one.it's ridiculous how people are arguing that it's part of the syllabus... yes wherever you find it in the syllabus they may say that you must have related text even 2 for that amount but i sincerely doubt the syllabus stated you must have 2 in your exam
As for losing marks - MAYBE - why? because MAYBE the marker might decide to not read your second related text which might cause a lack of cohesiveness in your response resulting in a lower mark