Thanks.First year bio and geo subjects are pretty basic, AFAIK. Zoology (and thus evolution) was focused on in second year and refined in third year. Geology was much the same.
I've found that I do look at the world more analytically, logically. But then, I'm not sure if that isn't how it's always seen things, lol.M
What I am getting at is when you study science to a high level (any of the common disciplines) do you see the world differently? At a micro level? Thinking in terms of particles and processes and asking more questions?
Yeah it is interesting, as your in the correct order. Would you laugh if you asked a science student why they are studying and they said they were passionate through their atheism?Well, I wouldn't say my atheism drove me to study science - more the other way around almost, though I was never religious. But having a scientific background really is very helpful in debates I find, especially with IDers/creationists.
Yeah its hard to know whether it is the direct effect of the degree. I guess I could say the same after two years of finance/economics, yet they would be more limited then science.I've found that I do look at the world more analytically, logically. But then, I'm not sure if that isn't how it's always seen things, lol.
In my elementary understanding, the more I look into science and the nature of things, the further I move away from the possibly of intelligence.Well, I wouldn't say my atheism drove me to study science - more the other way around almost, though I was never religious. But having a scientific background really is very helpful in debates I find, especially with IDers/creationists.
Nah. Lots of people I've heard of who had "deconverted" to atheism becoming very passionate about learning about, well, real truth rather than religious truth, and that I can very much understand.Yeah it is interesting, as your in the correct order. Would you laugh if you asked a science student why they are studying and they said they were passionate through their atheism?
That's certainly a noble thing.I guess for me, I have the same zeal and enquiry that many religious people (mistakenly) have about finding the "truth" (or closest constitutent). Obviously I am an atheist (the simplest reason possible) because religion has failed to produce satisfactory answers about the universe to me. however, unlike my religious pals I am not lazy. I won't just take what I'm told and believe it because the work is done (even though deep deep down you feel uneasy about it). The only way forward I see is to study the universe for myself. Logically, this leads me to science.
So in a round about way thats how atheism gets me to science.
Start at the beginning - bio.Having said that I have always had an interest in science for its own sake (did Phy and Chem in high school). But now Im not sure what science to take up nor which major would be at useful with my current degree? Any ideas Kway?
Theoretical physics is a bitch mathematically and conceptually. You really have to have had an extensive background in physics and maths in general to tackle the theoretical stuff. Shudder.I was looking into geology, could broadly fit with commerce, but it is very focused- doesn't really delve beyond the earth itself into life processes like evolution or any kind of physics. Obviously theoretical physics would be a gemstone degree in udnerstanding the universe so far, but I'm only average (band 5 in HSC 2 Unit) at maths...physics looks intimidating
Cheers, yea I'm electing bio next session, intro evolution subject anyway. I'll just take it as it comes, interest will lead to itnerest I guess (might take geo as well, although I would be happy with an basic understanding of geo).Nah. Lots of people I've heard of who had "deconverted" to atheism becoming very passionate about learning about, well, real truth rather than religious truth, and that I can very much understand.
That's certainly a noble thing.
Start at the beginning - bio.
Theoretical physics is a bitch mathematically and conceptually. You really have to have had an extensive background in physics and maths in general to tackle the theoretical stuff. Shudder.
That is a good point. In my experience, the world totally lacks real scientific knowledge. In many ways the majority of the population reveals "religious undertones" if you question them deep enough. That is, if I ask most adults I know who have no surface interest in religion, little science education etc (just kind of blue collar type ppl) many will still eventually produce "I don't know" or "Adam and eve" to the question "where did man come from?" Religion has invade our education at a deep level. When you start to think about the world and consciously conclude that your an atheist, unless you go on and begin the search for real scientific truths yourself, you will effectively be left with no explanations about anything at all.Nah. Lots of people I've heard of who had "deconverted" to atheism becoming very passionate about learning about, well, real truth rather than religious truth, and that I can very much understand.
For environmental consulting you need to have a background in geoscience - not just geology, but also geography (human and physical). For example, my degree (Marine Science) encompasses mostly biology and geoscience, and I'm majoring in both. But to get into consulting, you generally have to have a background in GIS to be hireable.So bio...is there much work along the lines of macroevolution, zoology etc (my uni seems to encourage you to go down this strand or the micro strand). In combination with a commerce degree and obviously hnours/masters, would you look at say careers in environmental consulting or something?
Ok cheers. Perhaps I should look at a geography major then, I loved geography in highschool.For environmental consulting you need to have a background in geoscience - not just geology, but also geography (human and physical). For example, my degree (Marine Science) encompasses mostly biology and geoscience, and I'm majoring in both. But to get into consulting, you generally have to have a background in GIS to be hireable.
My personal opinion is that surface level philosophy is very useful for challenging god and the typical creationist arguments. However, I have found that truly critical philosophy has made me somewhat more cynical towards the conception of reason as the 'ultimate arbitrator' and leaves me unable to rule out god entirely.I guess in some perfect world we could both not have to work and take up a BA in philosophy. Now thats when our critical skills would sharpen (I guess I also have that option against doing Bsc, but I think a Bsc is more respected).