ill_illusion
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
- Messages
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
im fucked
I have two and a half topics to memorize by tomrrow!! Tell me whoes fucked.. Me me me :-(im fucked
Beedle and tatum experimented with bread mould. Now this bread mould normally has enzymes that enable certain vitamins to be produced. Theyy used xrays to cause mutations in one of the genees and found that some of th ebread moulds could no longer produce the enzyme for producing a particular vitamin. THey hypothesised that one gene must code for one enzyme. Since enzymes are made of protein---it became the one gene one protein hypothesis.F'd in the A realllllllly bad....didn't realy pay attention all year & gotta learn all topics... FML
+ can anyone please explain to me the 'one gene-one protein' theory by Beadle and Tatum.... i honestly don't get it!
lol soz didnt know you had already posted.They were lead to their experiment by Thomas Morgan's eperiment with the Drosophila fruit fly (don't rlly remember how)
Then they used Neurospora crassa (bread mould) and 'attacked' half of their bread mould with X-rays and identified that under the influence of the rays the amino acid sequences underwent changes. So since this change affected the amino acid sequences the protein structures (produced after this time) also changed. They called this the one gene: one protein hypothesis.
Later, as more about cells and things were discovered scientists realised that proteins were made a step later than polypeptides. And that polypeptides were representative of any sequence of amino acids and therefore was a more accurate descritption of what had happened. It was then that the theory was revised in name to become the one gene: one polypeptide theory. As a better representation of all sequences rather than specialised sequences.
The experiment can account for the mutagenic nature of radiation as Beadle and Tatum observed permant, mutagenic changes within the mould. They noticed that the un-X-ray-exposed mould was still able to produce correct proteins whereas the X-ray affected mould would only do so under the influence of a solution designed to encourage protein synthesis.
i dont get it....why are ppl *****? did you not study for the trials/in the holz?glad to see im not the only one who's fucked.
yes i did.i dont get it....why are ppl *****? did you not study for the trials/in the holz?
i have four topics to remember tomorrow...*facepalm* ><I have two and a half topics to memorize by tomrrow!!
+1 good luck with that =)i have four topics to remember tomorrow...*facepalm* ><
oh my god.i have four topics to remember tomorrow...*facepalm* ><
They were lead to their experiment by Thomas Morgan's eperiment with the Drosophila fruit fly (don't rlly remember how)
Then they used Neurospora crassa (bread mould) and 'attacked' half of their bread mould with X-rays and identified that under the influence of the rays the amino acid sequences underwent changes. So since this change affected the amino acid sequences the protein structures (produced after this time) also changed. They called this the one gene: one protein hypothesis.
Later, as more about cells and things were discovered scientists realised that proteins were made a step later than polypeptides. And that polypeptides were representative of any sequence of amino acids and therefore was a more accurate descritption of what had happened. It was then that the theory was revised in name to become the one gene: one polypeptide theory. As a better representation of all sequences rather than specialised sequences.
The experiment can account for the mutagenic nature of radiation as Beadle and Tatum observed permant, mutagenic changes within the mould. They noticed that the un-X-ray-exposed mould was still able to produce correct proteins whereas the X-ray affected mould would only do so under the influence of a solution designed to encourage protein synthesis.