• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Complex (2 Viewers)

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
If A,B represent z1 and z2
OAB is equilateral, prove



What am I doing wrong? Or do I have to do soething with multiplying by Cis pi/3

LHS=





Let common modulus be z





RHS=







 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
If


Prove



I've been trying to do this for half an hour and I'm getting nowhere.
 

cyl123

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
95
Location
N/A
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
check the question... should it be (x+1)^2 instead of (x^2+1)^2

Btw is x a real number? If so.... think modulus
 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Ok. I tried taking modulus and I realised I couldn't get it.

The question was.

If



Prove

 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Got another one that I can't do.

Prove


for any pair of complex numbers z and w, where W is the conjugate of w
 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I'm stuck on another question



I've proved that if
then it's an equilateral triangle.

But I need help to show

 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010


Can someone start me off, because I've got no clue what to do, but not finish it. I wanna have a go.

Also need help with the last question of my paper, and then I'm done!!! I've tried employing the strategies you guys showed me in the previous questions, but this one puts me off because there are 3 brackets, and the vectors are reversed.

z1,z2,z3 are represented by the points p1,p2,p3 respectively. If p1p2p3 is an equilateral triangle, show

 
Last edited:

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I worked out a way to do your first question, but I don't know how to describe it in part. The only clue I can give is that at starts out as a circle geometric proof, and by playing with Arguments, turns algebraic. Tell me if you want to see it.

Yeah, I was on that track but didn't think it was right. May I see the solution?
 

nrlwinner

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
194
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Well, I don't know how to draw a diagram here, so I'll have to describe it for you.

Draw your circle through O, predominantly in the first quadrant. Let A, B, C represent z1, z2, z3 respectively. For ease of describing, draw O, A, B, C in clockwise order (and in left to right order), all in the first quadrant. (The same logic works if they are drawn otherwise.) Produce AB to D.

Angle AOC = arg z1 - arg z3.

Angle CBD = arg (z1 - z2) - arg (z2 - z3)
(Tell me if you don't get that)

So arg (z1 - z2) - arg (z2 - z3) = arg z1 - arg z2 [ext angle of cyclic quad = opp int angle]

Rearrange:
arg(z1 - z2) - arg z1 = arg (z2 - z3) - arg z3

Add in the same 'fudge factor' on both sides of the =:
arg (z1 - z2) - arg z1 - arg z2 = arg (z2 - z3) - arg z3 - arg z2





Can you see that it is now proved?

What's D?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top