yay we have a winnarIt's no worse than any other taxpayer funded medical expense. She should be entitled to state government assistance in accessing treatment, as much as any other individual.
If you refused treatment for all other lifestyle diseases, obesity, alcohol, tobacco, there really isn't much disease left to treat. Would you refuse treatment to an obese person after the first heart attack because they continued to eat?
but she started on dexamphetamine...withdrawal from that isn't that bad at all...Your just angry for a few weeksHeroin withdrawal is pretty bad
yes. she's already had her one chance and its unfair to other people who have more of a right to their first liver transplant who wont go and abuse their new body part by taking drugsso like graney said
anyone who undertakes risky activities that cause health implications, shouldnt be offered tax payer funded health care
i see
or if they are, they should only be offered it once?
hmmyes. she's already had her one chance and its unfair to other people who have more of a right to their first liver transplant who wont go and abuse their new body part by taking drugs
what a wastehmm
what part of
her father is donating 1/3 of his own liver to her
dont you understand?
This.no, no
sure, she can have another transplant
she just has to stay in line like everyone else
Which is what is happening presently. The system is actually more punitive than what you're suggesting, as the state of WA has refused any possibility of her receiving a second transplant from a deceased donor. The outrage is about her receiving the same treatment options available to anyone else.no, no
sure, she can have another transplant
she just has to stay in line like everyone else
Personal responsibility, something they believed in during the Dark Ages.Actually she originally became a drug addict/had her liver wrecked by prescription medicine she was given when she was like 12, it was beyond her control.