Souuuuuurrrrcccceeee please.
Australian Institute of Criminology - View paper
Not only is the article quite a good read itself, there are sources for further reading at the bottom.
No, however homosexuality was decriminalized in the 60s and 70s. These studies are pseudo-scientific. They are psychological profiles based on asking flawed questions and poorly compiled sample populations.
I read several of the ones linking drugs to homosexuality, and it surveyed a group of young homosexual men who were regular party-goers at inner-city nightclubs, cited statistics and offered no comparison with the same statistics in a constant sample group of heterosexual young men of the same age-bracket, socio-economic status and social circle.
But some of them are as recent as 2003. Even if say 2-3 of them you showed to be defunct, what of the rest? You cannot fairly condemn all of them without reviewing each on a case-by-case basis.
Let me break down one such study that you linked to.
Health risks of the homosexual lifestyle
This is dishonest. I never presented this link as to an actual study.
Websites: (not necessarily of the studies above, just miscellaneous links you may want to check out as well):
I made it clear that the web links were to miscellaneous websites, and were not necessarily of the studies I posted above.
Somewhat typically, you opted to direct your efforts at attacking the Christian website, while ignoring the actual studies and papers I posted above the random links.
Now firstly, basic source analysis that anyone in year 10 is familiar with. The Catholic Church has an extremely vested interest in slandering homosexuals and defending their own views that are disproven by science, and this is evident in how the scientific statistics are misquoted and evidence misused in order to further their agenda.
Even if that were the case, that would make them no better than the various homosexal activist who for years artificially inflated the % figure of the LGBT population to 10%, and now 5%, when the more accurate figure closer resembles 1% as well as playing down the various health risks associated with homosexual sex, as well as promoting pseudo-science relating to the discovery of a so called "gay-gene".
So far unsupported, unreferenced bigotry to introduce the article, good work.
It all goes on like that. It is scientifically unsupported, using flawed statistical analysis.
These are not credible scientific sources. You and they have not proven anything. There is no scientific evidence cited by these articles. They cite statistics and make claims based on those when any rational person can see the problem with the statistics they cite.
I never presented the website which you attacked as being a credible scientific study, I even referred to it and those around it as misellaneous links which "you may want to check out as well".
Well you believe in a fairytale.
Except not only is there proof of Christ and His performing miracles, there is proof of His reserection.
We evolved from apes over the last 8 million years. That is a fact.
We were not created in our current form 6,000 years ago. That is a fact.
The Earth did not come into being as we recognize it for the better part of 7 billion years after the birth of the Universe. That is a fact.
Snakes can not talk, Men do not come back to life, they can not part seas, they can not issue plagues and they can not stop the Earth from orbiting around the Sun and force it to orbit in the opposite direction for an hour. That is a fact.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and the Bible provides none, and to believe in such a violent cult without evidence is absurd.
Yes yes yes, we all know, and something can come from nothing and life from non-life and there is no purpose to anything, yet we somehow have rights, and religion is the greatest evil mankind has ever manufactured (which is funny because without a God to dictate an unbias immaterial standard of behaviour, evil can never be defined).
Without God, knowledge of anything becomes impossible.
