wow dude, relax you think you went to a selective school so you are better than the rest of the non-selective kids. Cant wait until University and you get your ass handed to you by non-selective kids.
You're a complete douchebag you know that? When have I ever
said I was better than another person on here because I went to a selective school? All I've said was that schools like Ruse and Hornsby Girls get excellent results, which is hardly being egotistical as:
1. I don't even go to either of those schools, and
2. The results published in the newspaper speak of themselves.
And you're the jerk saying that I didn't put effort in, and the fact that I came 4th was shit.
You can whinge and bitch about Ruse all you want, but only those who aren't jealous know that students there
ARE indeed, generally, much better.
And I can't believe you would even say I thought I was better than other people...yes I went to a selective school, but I also come from a working class background, so I had to work my ass off to compete with kids who could afford texts books/the latest comps/software.
You have this stupid, stereotypical stuck up image of selective kids as being snobbish, when in fact, they can be working as hard, or even much more harder than you. So stop bitching about people from those schools, it's not their fault their schools generally performs better. I dislike people who go "Oh, what's the point of going to a selective school" as if they think they're so much better than it, when in fact they're probably only jealous of the people there. No-one ever bitches about how public school sucks, so stop bitching about selective schools and being a gronk.
Wow i can't believe a selective kid like you doesn't get it - it's just another reason why i didn't go to one =='
^ Here's another great example
WOW. That is the worst example to give and it couldnt be more wrong, as first of all, assuming there are only 3 students in this cohort, the assessment marks and exam marks (assuming you got hsc marks and exam marks mixed up) dont match at all and are impossible to achieve, since the assessment marks of the students WILL correlate directly to the exam marks, that is, their assessment mark will be 95, 93, 91, but the allocation of these marks to which student will be entirely dependent on ranks... from there, the assessment mark and exam mark are averaged to give your hsc marks
I agree.
Research my friend, research.
Seriously, I can't be bothered with you. Believe what you want, but don't go telling other people they're wrong and try to instill what you know in them. No-one's explanations are of lesser value than your own, so unless you can pull out an information sheet from the Department of Education explaining how your hypothesis is the valid, then stop making it sound like you know everything. You don't have a thing to back up what you say, so don't go telling people shit unless you can vouch for it.
Hence, there isn't any point for me to post beyond this point. I'm sure students can pick and choose whatever they want.
