• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Mandatory Internet Censorship in Australia (1 Viewer)

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,077
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Essentially, the law states that anything considered 'offensive' by 'a reasonable person' is illegal. This is why things depicting urolagnia and coprophilia are usually banned.

As to defining what constitutes as a reasonable person makes the law ridiculous.
 

thongetsu

Where aren't I?
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,883
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
It's funny how 70% of people HungryBeast asked agreed with this filter and so many people on BoS oppose it. Then again the opinion of like 85% of people on BoS don't count since they probably aren't old enough to vote.
 

thongetsu

Where aren't I?
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,883
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
or you could be both, a terrible combination unless you're the addict
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
808
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
With internet censorship...what exactly are they censoring? Opposition to the goverment? Porn?
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
3,411
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2013
Self harm too and prolly more stuff i forget, but whatever they are saying now will expand a lot once they are given a chance to flex their authority and encompass more and more stuff.
 

thongetsu

Where aren't I?
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,883
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
theyre supposedly filtering kiddy porn and other shit
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,077
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
With internet censorship...what exactly are they censoring? Opposition to the goverment? Porn?
In addition to some forms of pornography, No Clean Feed states:

The list of material to be banned includes much more than child sexual abuse material. The category of material that has been 'refused classification' includes websites about euthanasia, controversial movies such as 'Ken Park' and 'Baise-moi', and many games that are designed for people over 16 years of age.
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,077
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Additionally:

The filter will block access to material that is currently legal to possess and view
Material that is 'refused classification' (RC) includes much more than child abuse material.

The National Classification Code defines what material is to be Refused Classification in Australia. The code states that the Classification Board must refuse to classify films, publications, and computer games that:


•describe, depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified; or
•describe or depict in a way that is likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult, a person who is, or appears to be, a child under 18 (whether the person is engaged in sexual activity or not); or
•promote, incite or instruct in matters of crime or violence.

The Code also states that all computer games that are unsuitable for a minor to see or to play are to be refused classification.

The only material that is illegal to possess in Australia is child sexual abuse material. In all States and Territories except for Western Australia and certain parts of the Northern Territory, it is legal for adults to view and own material that has been refused classification. Australia's classification regime has always been about empowering adults to make appropriate choices and only restricting the public sale and demonstration of RC material. The filter, however, will try to prevent all Australians from accessing, rather than selling, prohibited material.

Based on previous decisions of the Classification Board, things that would be blocked include:


•information about euthanasia;
•movies such as Ken Park or Baise-Moi;
•books such as Join the Caravan and Defence of the Muslim Lands; and

Items that have been banned because they "promote, incite or instruct in matters of crime or violence" include things like:


•a satirical article called "The Art of Shoplifting" in a student newspaper (•a computer game that features "an amateur graffiti artist [...] who uses graffiti and tagging as a way to protest the corrupt Dystopic city of New Radius, in a future world where freedom of expression is suppressed by a tyrannical, Orwellian city government" because it "provided elements of promotion of the crime of graffiti."
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,077
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
it's probably a safe bet to assume this filter will eventually include lots of harmless crap that shouldn't be filtered
That's definitely one of the big concerns of those opposed.
 

brendroid

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
702
Location
Trapped inside my head
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
To misquote a misguided comment someone made about Life of Brian being banned in an American state:

'This is Australia, this doesn't happen here.'

We're supposed to promote freedom of expression and ideas. This censorship idea is going against this.
 

Omar-Comin

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
144
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Step off kiddies because it's time the adults limited your online diet.

I mean why do you lowlifes care about this net filter so much..? the only people it's going to effect are online pushers of ethnic animal pack rape videos, and those type of people don't have the right to 'express themselves'.
 

iRuler

Premium Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
6,731
Location
3.141592654
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2014
We're supposed to promote freedom of expression and ideas. This censorship idea is going against this.
This.

I hate Rudd, what an idiot.

This is a democratic country.
 

abbeyroad

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
891
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Step off kiddies because it's time the adults limited your online diet.

I mean why do you lowlifes care about this net filter so much..? the only people it's going to effect are online pushers of ethnic animal pack rape videos, and those type of people don't have the right to 'express themselves'.
are you fucking kidding me you dumb fuck? the filter will not block out mere child porn but rather a whole range of content that is considered "refused classification"; the acma compiles the rc list based on the lists of child abuse material provided by various overseas agencies as well as complaints from the public, that means anyone and their dog can have something added to the blacklist. once the filtering is in place, be prepared to have pretty much the interwebz added to the blacklist by various religious lobby groups.

also, mandatory isp backbone level censorship is a slippery slope. we don't have the first amendment, there is no legislative guarantee in place that the government will not use the filter to curtail free speech and to block out political dissent in the future. this whole bullshit goes against what liberal democracy stands for. we may as well become a province of the "people's republic of china".
 

scarybunny

Rocket Queen
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
3,820
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Hah in a Hungry Beast interview, Conroy compared the proposed Australian filter to China's filter.

And the interviewer just had this look on his face... like how could drawing a parallel to China, that doesn't let you use Facebook or google Tiananmen square, possibly be a good thing.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top