We made a mistake with Rudd, didn't we? (3 Viewers)

[mirakon]

i dare you give every example of where i am wrong, what the alternate 'right' answer is and why/how this is so.

if you can give me such a comment that i cannot possibly respond to, good for you. but i am yet to see it. therefore you have no evidence that im wrong. your empty statements are getting you nowhere - i am actually talking politics, but you are trying to pick out whats right and wrong without justifying your answer. typical liberal....

I did this a couple of pages back but you ignored it. Go find it and reply. If not, then gtfo. Do not make another post before successfully replying.

 

[Lauchlan]

Howard -I believe- is one of the best PM's if not THE BEST

probaly the second-most pathetic quote in this thread, the winner being the first post where Blatus goes on about how much he loves howard and wants him as a wife.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

so? everyone using public hospitals you idiot - even private users.
justify why it is good to make mainstream services worse? your pathetic.

it would be better is this "mainstream service" was privatised so it would be no longer crappy

and lol at you calling be a Liberal after repeatingly saying im an anarcho-capitalist which is pretty much opposite to the Liberal and labour party

 

[Lauchlan]

lol how about don't try and fix if it ain't broken?

if theres a crack in a vase do you fix it? yes, in time.... and that time has come.
the vase is not broken, your right, but its not as good as it could be... and if a government can do something to help this happen then they should.

just face it, theres not a single comment you can give me that i cant throw back in your face. HA

 

[mirakon]

Lauchlan is noticeably ignoring my superior argument. I wonder why?

 

[SylviaB]

under ultimate liberal power our generation would be suffering and under tyranny.
i would go with communism (which isnt the aim of labor anyway) over that.

this is pretty much the dumbest thing ever

 

[scuba_steve2121]

Lauchlan is noticeably ignoring my superior argument. I wonder why?

hes attacking me cause he knows im not gonna write a post that is over 5 lines

 

[Lauchlan]

err...yeh but that's kinda what the thread happens to be about.

doesnt matter - your still living in the past when you could be dicussing the present.

but its good you accept that the old man howard is dead forever in politics..... ahhhh that makes me feel happy.... ahhhhh (i hope this is pissing you off)

 

[scuba_steve2121]

this is pretty much the dumbest thing ever

already pointed it out but i was ignored

 

[Lauchlan]

sentence doesn't make sense

also communism really? you would prefer living in poverty?

1. yes it does make sense.
2. read the entire sentense - communism isnt the aim, nor is poverty you delusional freak.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

1. yes it does make sense.
2. read the entire sentense - communism isnt the aim, nor is poverty you delusional freak.

communism = poverty and the sentence doesn't make sense

 

[Lauchlan]

you got to be kidding me right of course we now what we want and need

also thing is Abbot wouldn't be a good PM he would just be less crappy then Rudd

lesser of two idiots

1. you think you do, which is different to reality.
2. i told you to talk up abbott like youve been doing about howard. you fail to this.... and you go back to your only strategy of criticising rudd.
3. do what i asked. if u dont you prove to me you have nothing to back up what your saying about abbott - comparisons mean nothing to me. if you cant say things abbot has done to highlight him as a future PM without getting off the topic - then you might as well say im right and your wrong.

 

[Grape juice]

m8, get going on your

English Advanced, English Extension, Mathematics Advanced, Biology, Geography, Legal Studies, Society and Culture.

 

[Lauchlan]

I did this a couple of pages back but you ignored it. Go find it and reply. If not, then gtfo. Do not make another post before successfully replying.

here is my successful reply - if your comment was so well responsive to my question then you will have no trouble in typing it again. im not looking for it, so make a copy of it or admit you cant answer the question properly.

 

[funkshen]

My sister tutors first year political economy. That would explain the prol revolutionary spark in ongitsanjali's otherwise empty skull. And there are probably more of them, too.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

1. you think you do, which is different to reality.
2. i told you to talk up abbott like youve been doing about howard. you fail to this.... and you go back to your only strategy of criticising rudd.
3. do what i asked. if u dont you prove to me you have nothing to back up what your saying about abbott - comparisons mean nothing to me. if you cant say things abbot has done to highlight him as a future PM without getting off the topic - then you might as well say im right and your wrong.

omg why are u forcing me to write a long post anyways here we go

i need food and water to live fact also right now i want some macas

i have never talked up Abbot

Howard was a good PM because of his right leaning economic polices other than that he like every PM in aus history are idiots

Rudd equals one big inefficient government which is built on a precarious Keynesian foundation

of course i can't highlight things Abbot has done he has never been in such a position of power to show this unlike Howard.

all i know that Abbot like most Liberal governments of history will = a smaller and more efficient government that focus on economic stability and growth and empowering business to get the fucking job done

 

[Lauchlan]

it would be better is this "mainstream service" was privatised so it would be no longer crappy

and lol at you calling be a Liberal after repeatingly saying im an anarcho-capitalist which is pretty much opposite to the Liberal and labour party

so your saying those who are not wealthy dont deserve hospital treatment?

im calling you many things, but im not calling you fair - which is the labor party.

 

[Lauchlan]

Lauchlan is noticeably ignoring my superior argument. I wonder why?

im awaiting an answer to my question, fool - which you so noticeably are neglecting to reproduce. i wonder why?

 

[Lauchlan]

this is pretty much the dumbest thing ever

says the user with a lego display pic.
it was responding to a "dumber" quote.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

so your saying those who are not wealthy dont deserve hospital treatment?

im calling you many things, but im not calling you fair - which is the labor party.

private health insurance is targeted at the upper to lower middle class because the government has taken the lower class market with its inefficient monopoly.

if this was removed business would release new and different plans to meet the budgets of these people.

on a side note ffs private health insurance isn't that fucking much, pay that instead of buying smokes and alcohol like most lower class people do