Lauchlan
Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 671
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
welcome to my worldAt any rate it would certainly be easier than educating you.
welcome to my worldAt any rate it would certainly be easier than educating you.
This year, next year or in 20 years, there will be no such thing as a effective government controlled internet filter.i agree that the problem isnt about calls.
one problem is that majority of the time people aren't being relevent.
instead of giving a detailed proposed contradiction to whateva i say, they try to undermine me personally.
let me make one thing clear.
i am NOT for the filter mentioned this year.
what i am for is a effective filter concept, because i know that the govts filter was a fail. it may not exist, but its the concept that i agree with.
i actually respected your comment up until your last sentence. you say that its not about calls then you say that. your overreacting at someone who just as well agrees with what your saying. so please dont contradict yourself. otherwise, join the club of people who attempt so frequently to ridicule me.
Umm...and the other people in this thread?snowfox the amount times you have mentioned this goddamn filter you could have made up the needed 4000+ posts in the cake thread.
inshallah snowfox will stop posting in this thread
pessimistic much? lol calm down and look at the political context. if your liberal govt and green companions are anything like they usually are (ie. oppose rudd) then it will be blocked in the senate hands down.This year, next year or in 20 years, there will be no such thing as a effective government controlled internet filter.
i love this stage of the arguementpessimistic much? lol calm down and look at the political context. if your liberal govt and green companions are anything like they usually are (ie. oppose rudd) then it will be blocked in the senate hands down.
you really are getting worked up for nothing.
you only enter the argument when you like, and then choose the mock the argument - but continue the debate further... irony!i love this stage of the arguement
here the clearly opposition has nothing left. so now it is "gezz man its not a big deal like don't worry about it man, calm down seriously, lets just be friends and forget about it k?????"
bingoyou only enter the argument when you like, and then choose the mock the argument - but continue the debate further... irony!
what would you like to argue about then? your just going to have to accept that many people are for "a" filter - depsite everything you have to say.
others, like you, oppose because it will be a pain when fair sites are blocked. fair enough - but we GET IT for JESUS CHRIST'S SAKE.
if there is something i missed than argue away with me - but you just gotta realise the whole debate is stupid (im not the only one who has said it)
btw, im not asking to be friends. never. ever. ever.
hmmm.... i suppose your next comment will be some pathetic hypothetical anti-filter argument AND/OR a personal attack on me.
i keep responding, but my posts are being blocked.People simply get tired of your shit arguments hence the personal attacks.
When people are learning what the filter is actually about, they are ultimately turning against it. Just about everyone is doing it except you, which is proven in the SMH Poll.
EXACTLY - so why are most people on this thread raging about it when proxies are the solution anyways. *sigh*Well, Internet Censorship SEEMS like a good idea. 1 word, proxies.
Proxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.EXACTLY - so why are most people on this thread raging about it when proxies are the solution anyways. *sigh*
lol lets not go back to the porn discussion like you guyz did earlier.Proxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.
or anything over a few MB in size, for that matterProxies are slow. Trust me some people do wanna see porn in HD.