Typos/Changes (1 Viewer)

[PaterzAttack]

Did anyone notice any typos? - I'm guessing if we had changes, everyone would know?

--

I noticed trivial typos in the section 1 question they said Eilis's instead of Eilis'
and on the blue submission sheet it said "Section II" twice instead of having a "Section II" and a "Section III".

 

[Proteus]

Yes, I noticed the

Section I [ ]
Section II [ ]
Section III [ ]

 

[JustJackie]

Did anyone notice any typos? - I'm guessing if we had changes, everyone would know?

--

I noticed trivial typos in the section 1 question they said Eilis's instead of Eilis'
and on the blue submission sheet it said "Section II" twice instead of having a "Section II" and a "Section III".

Eilis's instead of Eilis' is one of those interchangeable things, kinda like an hour and a hour, they have both been used enough in the English language to have both forms as acceptable.

 

[rogerlam]

Did anyone notice any typos? - I'm guessing if we had changes, everyone would know?

--

I noticed trivial typos in the section 1 question they said Eilis's instead of Eilis'
and on the blue submission sheet it said "Section II" twice instead of having a "Section II" and a "Section III".

FUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK
i wrote Eilis' first but then changed it to Eilis's cause the question had it

MAN FUUUUCCKKK I HOPE I DONT GET PENALISED

 

[MotivationSeek]

FUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK
i wrote Eilis' first but then changed it to Eilis's cause the question had it

MAN FUUUUCCKKK I HOPE I DONT GET PENALISED

You won't, dont' worry! There are heaps of people calling her Ellis. As long as the material was good you should be fine!

 

[aphorae]

FUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK
i wrote Eilis' first but then changed it to Eilis's cause the question had it

MAN FUUUUCCKKK I HOPE I DONT GET PENALISED

Eilis's is the recommended, literary spelling. It was not a typo. Eilis' is also admissible though.