• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Terry Solutions MX2 (1 Viewer)

Nympha

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
74
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Is anyone else finding that the file link is broken or something? I could download the solutions last night but I can't now.. :(
 

Aquawhite

Retiring
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
4,946
Location
Gold Coast
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2013
MX2 exam looked great - pretty easy. Thanks to Terry Lee for doing this another year round.
 

cssftw

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
207
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
depending on how strict the markers are:

strict marking: 72/120

soft happy marking: 80/120
 

eyeswideshut

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
61
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
^ this. hoping for 70 and just getting an e4 but there are people going '100/120 :( :(' and im like ???? cos they're getting full scaling anyway! anything above 93 according to the atar calculator is full scaling to 99.95
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,401
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
what do you mean..
The solutions in the current link is an updated version of the one he uploaded yesterday which contained a few major errors (possibly in response to the identification of such errors in this thread)
 

brachester

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
166
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
anyone knows anything about the E4 cutoff from recent years? i heard the 2009's was very low, my bro only finished 4 questions with a bit of 5 and 6 yet he still manage to scrap an E4 with mark of 91%
 

bikinigal

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
59
Location
Trying to light a candle in a cyclone...
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
If he scored full marks for the first 4 Qs & about 16/30 for Qs 5 & 6 that would have translated (roughly) to a 90.8 or a 91 reported. I've found 3U & 4U maths (esp 4U) maintain the most stability in alignment (esp E4 marks) across the years than subjects like Chem & Phys (more so with Physics which is far more unpredictable - eg in 2009 a raw mark of 85 aligned to 92.2 while in 2010 a raw 83 aligned higher to 93.2). I think the reason is that the 4U cohort remains basically the same (ie in terms of ability).
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top