Hint: Put the RHS into cis form somehow.damn...i cant get the second part to that question ^
Da fuck?Consider T(subscript (a))(z)=z/(1+az). Show that T(subscr.(a))(z) constitutes a transformation group by examining the composition T(subcr.(b))(T(subscr.(a))(z))
Go Carrotsticks, try and prove this. I can give you some hints if you want./
that makes it easier!Hint: Put the RHS into cis form somehow.
Oh and I forgot to type into the question for part (b):
Terribly sorry about that.
Is this what you mean?Consider T(subscript (a))(z)=z/(1+az). Show that T(subscr.(a))(z) constitutes a transformation group by examining the composition T(subcr.(b))(T(subscr.(a))(z))
Go Carrotsticks, try and prove this. I can give you some hints if you want./
No, it is not 'conformal field theory'.It's conformal field theory. Want to see if Carrotsticks knows. He's at Uni after all.
You are mistaken.Yes that is what I mean, if the little circle indicates a multiplication. It is part of conformal field theory, specifically the two dimensional conformal group. Physics is the application of mathematics. I find that quite offensive, you think I pulled this off the internet. Look it up. You wont find it.
not longHow long does this take you in LaTex?
this will help with part i.
Yeh, I had a lot of unnecessary working at the bottom of the page since i didnt know what to do until you told me that n=4k, k integral.You are mistaken.
The 'little circle' is the universal symbol for 'function composition'.
Your originally posted question was "composition T(subcr.(b))(T(subscr.(a))(z))"
Then you assert that the 'little circle indicates a multiplication'.
This is what the little circle (in the definition of composition) means:
Going back on track, good work bleakarcher and rolpsy!
However bleakarcher, your method was quite long (and admittedly very illegible as you reached the bottom of the page).
Again, my apologies for causing you grief by forgetting about that little bit of crucial information.Yeh, I had a lot of unnecessary working at the bottom of the page since i didnt know what to do until you told me that n=4k, k integral.
I loved this question!not long
this will help with part i.
1984 I think – first year with standard integralsI loved this question!
I recall this question from a HSC paper. One of the earlier years.