Abortion (3 Viewers)

[mirakon]

you provided the premise
i expanded upon it, to show that it was flawed

do
you
understand

I do not think he is familiar with reductio ad absurdum

 

[boris]

no, you need to clarify what the fuck you are on about.

look mate i can lead a horse to water but i cant make it drink

you probably think you can make it drink though, being a fascist and all

 

[na110793]

you provided the premise
i expanded upon it, to show that it was flawed

do
you
understand

i spoke of animals being food
you said babies are food
humans, to the western, civilised world
are not food
you said this

you said an animal is food, so is a baby (potentially)

you said that a foetus, if allowed to, can progress to the point of cognitive function where it can communicate. i extended that premise to include sperm, because technically any sperm can do the same and given your original point, any sperm that doesnt make it to personhood is tantamount to a late term abortion or infanticide

how the fuck can a sperm "do the same" when it needs an egg, its second half, to reach a point where it can function at a humanoid level

 

[na110793]

look mate i can lead a horse to water but i cant make it drink

you probably think you can make it drink though, being a fascist and all

i laughed at this

 

[mirakon]

How does a fetus function at a humanoid level

 

[na110793]

How does a fetus function at a humanoid level

have you read the previous posts

 

[boris]

i spoke of animals being food
you said babies are food
humans, to the western, civilised world
are not food
you said this



how the fuck can a sperm "do the same" when it needs an egg, its second half, to reach a point where it can function at a humanoid level

how can a foetus be considered any differently, when it needs a female human 'host' to reach a point where it can function at a humanoid level

before it is born it is essentially the same as a tapeworm

 

[boris]

babies can definitely be considered food

why does something have to be customary to 'western civilisation' for it to be food

 

[kaz1]

yes, animals are a source of food.
an animal is not capable of having a conversation with you. of thinking rationally. a foetus, if allowed to properly mature, will.

What about an ape that knows sign language?


Anyways 100% pro abortion, you do whatever the fuck you want with the parasite that lives inside you be it a tapeworm or a foetus.

 

[mirakon]

have you read the previous posts

Yes I have, but can you please clarify the question as I cannot exactly pinpoint your answer

 

[CallanT]

Pro-Abortion

also, you guys seem to be stuck in the situation where one party cant comprehend the other.

 

[na110793]

how can a foetus be considered any differently, when it needs a female human 'host' to reach a point where it can function at a humanoid level

before it is born it is essentially the same as a tapeworm

would you eat a foetus?

i wont even speculate if you would or not.

 

[boris]

i wouldn't but im sure there are plenty of people who would if they were in a situation that required it

would you rather starve to death or eat a foetus

is this even relevant

 

[mirakon]

would you eat a foetus?

i wont even speculate if you would or not.

I would if i could download one

 

[na110793]

Yes I have, but can you please clarify the question as I cannot exactly pinpoint your answer

I can't clarify my answer because I can't pinpoint boris' question

 

[mirakon]

I can't clarify my answer because I can't pinpoint boris' question

I was referring to your answer to my question as to what qualifies a fetus as a humanoid

 

[na110793]

Pro-Abortion

also, you guys seem to be stuck in the situation where one party cant comprehend the other.

we are.

 

[na110793]

i wouldn't but im sure there are plenty of people who would if they were in a situation that required it

would you rather starve to death or eat a foetus

is this even relevant

babies are a source of food

any sperm, if allowed to properly mature will be capable of having a conversation with you

die

 

[boris]

a fascist getting angry at dissent

who would have though

 

[na110793]

a fascist getting angry at dissent

who would have though

not angry, just poked a huge whole in your argument