Should assassination be a legitimate foreign policy tool? (3 Viewers)

[Lolsmith]

the french resistance in ww2 were terrorists

Armia Krajowa

scum cunts

 

[boris]

i wonder if there is a historical correlation between
the number of groups who are deemed 'terrorists' and authoritarianism etc

then again i guess authoritarianism forces opposition groups ot adopt more violent techniques idk


dont like an opposition group? outlaw them

 

[kaz1]

I reckon terrorists get fair treatment by the US. And by fair, I mean not tortured.

lolwut, have you heard of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay?

 

[ZombieApocalypse]

lolwut, have you heard of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay?

Maybe i'm naive, but I reckon those are really rare cases.

 

[boris]

sigh

 

[Phoenix Fury]

I reckon terrorists get fair treatment by the US. And by fair, I mean not tortured.

lol, Jeezuz chroiyst

 

[funkshen]

if the terrorists didnt want to get waterboarded they should have complied with their captors demands

 

[CO7]

Yes, assassination should be a legitimate foreign policy tool but only as a last resort. If all measures of diplomatic attempts fail then it should come to this.. however if this is legitimised, I am sure that authorities will use this so often because it's easier and simpler than negotiations.