RealiseNothing
what is that?It is Cowpea
It's really not that hard.While I believe it can be done, I'm hesitant to believe you can currently do it.
It's really not that hard.While I believe it can be done, I'm hesitant to believe you can currently do it.
tbh I don't think you could do it that fast.I can do it that fast too..... (so can spiral).
haha
"So sometimes cries, perhaps sometimes I hit them".
Haha.
dat shits fuk'd
"So sometimes cries, perhaps sometimes I hit them".
Haha.
lol "in my opinion".tbh I don't think you could do it that fast.
You can defs do it, but not that speed imo.
you can't do it.lol "in my opinion".
>never even met me irl.
He canWhile I believe it can be done, I'm hesitant to believe you can currently do it.
legit +1Realise is a maffs god
What?If we look at it at face value, it's implausible:
1. We've got proof of someone who makes media appears as 'the fastest'
2. We've got untested anecdotal evidence from someone else
I'm not saying you can't do it at all, or couldn't in the future. But at that speed, especially with the decimal point recall, I don't believe it can currently be done.
Exactly. So should I assume you can or you can't?lol "in my opinion".
>never even met me irl.
I know right.Realise, they're callin u out. unch on brah
But to me though, that's still hearsay evidence. And because of the level of claim being made, that's not enough to accept at face value. You don't have to prove it to me; there's no reason to do so, that's just how I'm treating the evidence available.What?
I did it at meat, anyone there can vouch for it, ie twinklegal above.
For example when I asked you for the cube root of (651/4(pi)), you said 3.6 or 3.7, then finalised 3.7. Don't get me wrong, that is amazing but this guy or other 'human calculators' would have gotten it exactly to more decimals quickly.What?
I did it at meat, anyone there can vouch for it, ie twinklegal above.
tbh I'm not sure if he would even be able to do it to heaps of decimal places or instantly.For example when I asked you for the cube root of (651/4(pi)), you said 3.6 or 3.7, then finalised 3.7. Don't get me wrong, that is amazing but this guy or other 'human calculators' would have gotten it exactly to more decimals quickly.
Even then when you said 3.6 or 3.7 did you do it in less than a second?
+1But to me though, that's still hearsay evidence. And because of the level of claim being made, that's not enough to accept at face value. You don't have to prove it to me; there's no reason to do so, that's just how I'm treating the evidence available.
I think we should get more back to the video itself. That might take us back to a more neutral place.tbh I'm not sure if he would even be able to do it to heaps of decimal places or instantly.
He found the cube root of a perfect cube, which isn't hard to do at all.
I'd be a lot more impressed if he found the cube root of a random number.
Anyway I'm over this, no point, it's not going anywhere.