asking prev UMAT students : Medentry or F2F more like actual test? (1 Viewer)

[yohoihoi]

are the Medentry or Face2Face practise papers moer like UMAt papers?
or they just complete understatement of how hard the actual UMAT really is?
im very nervous, please give me some pointers >.<
HELLPP

 

[Dr_Fresh]

it depends

 

[ziaa]

from what ive heard from other students, f2f is usually easier. so itd probably be better to use medentry?

 

[Sanical]

What I've heard for medentry:
Section 1 - more or less on par
Section 2 - a bit different
Section 3 - much harder than the real umat

 

[iSplicer]

I've heard medentry...

 

[OMGITzJustin]

I've heard medentry...

was just wondering, how did you go in the umat? did you end up going to interviews for unsw, uws etc? or just took usyd (ie 99.95 atar)

 

[iSplicer]

was just wondering, how did you go in the umat? did you end up going to interviews for unsw, uws etc? or just took usyd (ie 99.95 atar)

I did rather poorly in the UMAT and thus received no first round undergrad interview offers anywhere =(. I ended up getting interview offers across the board after my ATAR was released, but I declined them all as I was set on usyd from the start.

 

[MUSE13]

isplicer did u do any study for the umat?

 

[Bearman]

isplicer did u do any study for the umat?

he did but the UMAT is basically a lottery with severely diminishing returns from study once you're ok at section 3

EDIT: on topic, f2f is absolute balls, i'd go with medentry