na110793
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2011
- Messages
- 377
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
otherwise* unexplainable.If the price increase is unexplainable, why are you trying to explain it?
otherwise* unexplainable.If the price increase is unexplainable, why are you trying to explain it?
Did u even read the article it's clearly explained ( and should be simpler since your doing science so it's kinda related)>earth is warming
>coldest winter
>hurr durr
what
http://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/files/2...mer_summary_of_final_decision_-_June_2012.pdfYou're going to sit there and tell me that the massive, unexplainable (we had new, energy efficient lighting and refrigeration installed last July) rise in our small business's electricity bill doesn't correlate with the introduction of the carbon tax?
It is implemented for quarterly electricity, and because that specific utility provider is marketed toward small business, they can use it as an excuse to raise rates and blame it on the tax.
i was going to comment on this but wasnt sure if it was right.http://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/files/2...mer_summary_of_final_decision_-_June_2012.pdf
Only half the increase is due to the carbon tax, do your research, electricity prices are regulated.
Also stupid, you claim the bill is quarterly, the quarter doesn't end until September, ergo you haven't even gotten a bill tha includes the carbon tax yet.
Even if he is on different quarters at most the bill can include 1 month of the carbon tax. Monthly cost in previous bill was $620 - new bill the only month with carbon tax would have a cost of $984, an almost 60% increase which is more than allowed and even if it were clearly gouging, I call shenanigansi was going to comment on this but wasnt sure if it was right.
i think i read a statistic saying " out of every 100$ in each energy bill only $9 is the carbon tax"Even if he is on different quarters at most the bill can include 1 month of the carbon tax. Monthly cost in previous bill was $620 - new bill the only month with carbon tax would have a cost of $984, an almost 60% increase which is more than allowed and even if it were clearly gouging, I call shenanigans
The Labor propaganda pamphlets about the carbon tax note that.i think i read a statistic saying " out of every 100$ in each energy bill only $9 is the carbon tax"
Propaganda pamphlets based on actual statistics, or else they would be imidiatley scrutinised by the libs within minutesThe Labor propaganda pamphlets about the carbon tax note that.
Or if you bothered to read the IPART report (the people who actually you know, set the electricity prices) you read that of the 18% rise in electricity prices half is due to the carbon tax, half of 18% is 9% which happens to be $9 out of every $100. Yeah, real propaganda (just like the aboriginal flag amirite?)The Labor propaganda pamphlets about the carbon tax note that.
dictionary.com definition of propogandaOr if you bothered to read the IPART report (the people who actually you know, set the electricity prices) you read that of the 18% rise in electricity prices half is due to the carbon tax, half of 18% is 9% which happens to be $9 out of every $100. Yeah, real propaganda (just like the aboriginal flag amirite?)
It does not have to be negative.information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
I had no clue bakers spent only $600 on power.Even if he is on different quarters at most the bill can include 1 month of the carbon tax. Monthly cost in previous bill was $620 - new bill the only month with carbon tax would have a cost of $984, an almost 60% increase which is more than allowed and even if it were clearly gouging, I call shenanigans
"your dad's" quarterly bill was $1800. divide by 3 broI had no clue bakers spent only $600 on power.
Funny you should say that, as a business we've seen an almost 50% increase in profit."your dad's" quarterly bill was $1800. divide by 3 bro
oh yeah and if your dad is stupid enough to not claim a significant deductible (atleast $7200 in yearly electricity costs?) his business deserves to be run into the ground. or he should fire his accountant.
I think he was referring to the dramaticly overblown "cost " of the carbon tax taking you out of business .Funny you should say that, as a business we've seen an almost 50% increase in profit.
So in other words the carbon tax isn't having an effect on your dad's bussiness? Get your story straight mate.Funny you should say that, as a business we've seen an almost 50% increase in profit.
An increase in costs is an effect. I'm not saying he's correct in blaming it, but assuming that there has been a cost increase (either by price gouging due to intervention or actual costs being passed on), just because his revenue has increased doesn't mean he is unaffected.So in other words the carbon tax isn't having an effect on your dad's bussiness? Get your story straight mate.
He said profits increased, not revenue, so yea, an effect, a positive one it seems.An increase in costs is an effect. I'm not saying he's correct in blaming it, but assuming that there has been a cost increase (either by price gouging due to intervention or actual costs being passed on), just because his revenue has increased doesn't mean he is unaffected.