haha why do you say that?Magic of Reality - Dawkins. Fuck, he's a good biologist, but such a shit human.
Yeah, that's chiefly why. He treats everyone else like they're a moron. The way he writes is essentially the textual equivalent of speaking really slowly and with emphasis on every word, like you would to the mentally retarded. Such an arrogant douche.haha why do you say that?
I read unweaving the rainbow. I didn't like the really dumbed down metaphors that plagued the book.
yeah, that really annoyed me. Especially the start where it's like 10 pages of him trying to help us fathom the minute possibility we had of even existing and how the time the earth has been around in comparison to the universe is like the tip of our fingernail compared to our arm span.Yeah, that's chiefly why. He treats everyone else like they're a moron. The way he writes is essentially the textual equivalent of speaking really slowly and with emphasis on every word, like you would to the mentally retarded. Such an arrogant douche.
Genius isn't really an excuse for being a douchebag though. And his fanatical faith in science annoys me. I consider myself a man of science, but Dawkins fucking worships logic and experimentation, rather than seeing them as just another means to the same end.yeah, that really annoyed me. Especially the start where it's like 10 pages of him trying to help us fathom the minute possibility we had of even existing and how the time the earth has been around in comparison to the universe is like the tip of our fingernail compared to our arm span.
but to be fair, he's a genius and has every right to act like he's smarter than everyone else because he is.
I don't think it's Dawkin's that is worshipping logic and reason, but rather, those who constantly use him and cite him. I have no real problem with the broad, aggressive, populist approach to science and religion that he takes, but the fan-boyism and minor celebrity worship that stems from that gets a bit much.Genius isn't really an excuse for being a douchebag though. And his fanatical faith in science annoys me. I consider myself a man of science, but Dawkins fucking worships logic and experimentation, rather than seeing them as just another means to the same end.
All I've ever read of Dawkins is the God Delusion, obviously he is not an author I have a tremendous amount of interest in but your description of him fits pretty neatly into his agenda, I suppose what I'm think though is "what do you expect." Everything I've seen/heard/read from him has basically been about providing mildly interest atheists of no extraordinary intellect with some digestible but more sophisticated than just "how can you believe in God, there's no proof.Yeah, that's chiefly why. He treats everyone else like they're a moron. The way he writes is essentially the textual equivalent of speaking really slowly and with emphasis on every word, like you would to the mentally retarded. Such an arrogant douche.
No, it's definitely him. In the introduction to Magic of Reality he goes to great lengths to explain the scientific method and why it is vastly superior to anything else.I don't think it's Dawkin's that is worshipping logic and reason, but rather, those who constantly use him and cite him. I have no real problem with the broad, aggressive, populist approach to science and religion that he takes, but the fan-boyism and minor celebrity worship that stems from that gets a bit much.
Have you read any Judith Butler yet?atm i am reading a bunch of legit really interesting studies about gender dichotomies in the education system
also Germaine Greer's book The Female Eunuch.
I don't care what anyone says, I am in love with her and I want to be her.