• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Has anyone solved this question yet?
I did this question a couple days ago and got I(n)=[e^x*sin^n(x)-ne^x*sin^(n-1)(x)cos(x)+n(n-1)I(n-2)]/[n^2+1] for the first part.
 

lolcakes52

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
286
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

No limits makes it a toughy

 
Last edited:

lolcakes52

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
286
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Same as you I presume, the last part says evaluate I5.
 

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Same as you I presume, the last part says evaluate I5.
Well I haven't even attempted that part but it doesn't look too difficult. I thought you were talking about UMADBRO's integral.
 

U MAD BRO

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
287
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Sorry everyone, I'll stop trolling, I even changed my DP ^_^
 

Shadowless

Member
Joined
May 3, 2010
Messages
342
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

U MAD BRO keep your integrals at the level of the MX2 integration topic. If you are interested in how to do these yourself, do outside research / ask in extracurricular. This thread is an inappropriate place to post them.

@Rolpsy nice question!

could someone explain to me what happened between the 1st line and the 2nd line?
 

nightweaver066

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
1,585
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

could someone explain to me what happened between the 1st line and the 2nd line?
He added the definite integrals of and together.

As they're both the same, it becomes 2I = etc.

He then put them both under the same denominator and multiplied numerator and denominator by 2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top