• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Violence erupts in Sydney over anti-Islam film (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Well it's one of the best. In the top 3 definitely.
I seriously doubt that. The US would be number one. Then vying for spots 2 & 3 you would have the British, French, Russian, Chinese etc all before Pakistan.
 

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
You can argue that Pakistan is also a battle ridden, poverty stricken shithole except with nuclear weapons.
I would agree with this. Pakistan would never use the weapons anyway. If they did they (Pakistan) would be annihiliated.

wot really? The less states with nuclear weapons the better.
This. I am fine with superpowers having some of them as it keeps rouge states more under control. Do I think Pakistan should have them? No. Do I think Iran should have them? No. Do I like the idea of China having them (I know they do)? No, although they are now the worlds second largest superpower so it is a reasonable expectation and there is nothing that can be done about that now.
 

moll.

Learn to science.
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
3,545
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Oh alright, so it's fine for America to be nuclear armed, but not others is it?

And i suggest you refrain from calling Pakistan a shithole, or it'll be reported. This ain't da hood bud.
But Pakistan is a battle-ridden, poverty-stricken shithole.
 

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Oh alright, so it's fine for America to be nuclear armed, but not others is it?

And i suggest you refrain from calling Pakistan a shithole, or it'll be reported. This ain't da hood bud.
No offense intended, but compared to America and Australia and other Western nations, Pakistan is a "shithole" as another poster put it.

It is fine for the US and certain nations that have shown they are sensible enough to have them.

NPT nuclear-weapon states (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States)
Other states with nuclear weapons (India, Pakistan, North Korea)
Other states believed to have nuclear weapons (Israel)
NATO nuclear weapons sharing states (Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Turkey)
States formerly possessing nuclear weapons (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, South Africa)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons

The NPT states (bolded) are fine.

Pakistan, India and North Korea are not so fine though. Perhaps in the future, India will have earned the right, although at the moment I don't see any need for them to have nuclear weapons.
 

moll.

Learn to science.
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
3,545
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I seriously doubt that. The US would be number one. Then vying for spots 2 & 3 you would have the British, French, Russian, Chinese etc all before Pakistan.
It depends by what measure you rate the intelligence services. Bigger budget =/= better.
I would argue that a measure of percentage of attacks prevented could do better, but this is not only unknown, it is biased towards those places which are insignificant or peaceful. Pretty sure Luxembourg's intelligence services would be the best in the world.
Perhaps how little you hear of them in the news? In which case America and Pakistan suck, whereas Russia, China and Britain are excellent.
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
Oh alright, so it's fine for America to be nuclear armed, but not others is it?

And i suggest you refrain from calling Pakistan a shithole, or it'll be reported. This ain't da hood bud.
I believe that America is slowly getting rid of it's nuclear weapons because it is a signitary to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, I may be wrong though.

Facts are facts Pakistan is a third world shithole, it's HDI is super low and sports teams dare not visit there because they fear for their lives.
 

moll.

Learn to science.
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
3,545
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I believe that America is slowly getting rid of it's nuclear weapons because it is a signitary to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, I may be wrong though.

Facts are facts Pakistan is a third world shithole, it's HDI is super low and sports teams dare not visit there because they fear for their lives.
Pretty sure they're just getting rid of them because the upkeep on the older designs is expensive and they have enough to ruin everyone's day several times over.
 

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Listen here bud. The US won't even think of invading Pakistan.... I mean..... WTF?
Military plans have been drawn up.

-Pakistan is the only nuclear armed muslim country in the world.
Parts of the Pakistani government may be idiots (e.g. the railways minister offering to pay Al Qaeda to behead people, that I posted above) although Pakistan is not stupid enough to go full scale nuclear rouge and attack anyone.

-Pakistan is the 5th/6th strongest army in the world (in terms of manpower, military spending, equipment etc)
They may have numbers, but against the US military I would say Pakistans soldiers look like children playing with wooden swords. They are simply not in the same league.

-China (regarded as one if not THE best friend of Pakistan) would not just watch on
China wouldn't be happy but they are not going to go to war with the US, Britain, Australia and the rest of the Western world over Pakistan.

Listen, Pakistan is not Afghanistan. You are associating the 6th most populous(nearly 200 million) country in the world with a battle ridden, poverty stricken (no offednse to Afghan brothers) Afghanistan.
Pakistan is not much better than Afghanistan was.

And the US can't even afford to undergo another invasion anyways. Plus we would show them who's boss of the muslim world. Long live land of the Pak.
You might suicide bomb some military checkpoints and kill US soldiers, but in a war between the US and Pakistan, the United States of America would certainly win. If you think otherwise you are deluded.
 

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
It depends by what measure you rate the intelligence services. Bigger budget =/= better.
I would argue that a measure of percentage of attacks prevented could do better, but this is not only unknown, it is biased towards those places which are insignificant or peaceful. Pretty sure Luxembourg's intelligence services would be the best in the world.
Perhaps how little you hear of them in the news? In which case America and Pakistan suck, whereas Russia, China and Britain are excellent.
Very good points.

I believe that America is slowly getting rid of it's nuclear weapons because it is a signitary to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, I may be wrong though.

Facts are facts Pakistan is a third world shithole, it's HDI is super low and sports teams dare not visit there because they fear for their lives.
This.

Lets not forget the Australia cricket team refusing to play there etc. It was only in 2009 in Pakistan that the touring Sri Lankan cricket teams bus was shot at by 12 men, injuring 6 of the players.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_attack_on_the_Sri_Lanka_national_cricket_team

Pretty sure they're just getting rid of them because the upkeep on the older designs is expensive and they have enough to ruin everyone's day several times over.
This. You are right on most things.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

7eleven

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
237
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I seriously doubt that. The US would be number one. Then vying for spots 2 & 3 you would have the British, French, Russian, Chinese etc all before Pakistan.
fair enough America is better than Pakistan but the British, French, Russian and Chinese intelligence r definitely not better than Pakistans ISI

http://www.dirjournal.com/info/the-worlds-best-intelligence-agencies/
http://www.tiptoptens.com/2011/02/08/top-10-best-intelligence-agencies/
http://au.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/202_top_10_list.html

Not to mention it is one of the least funded intelligence agencies.
 

PakiPrince

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
155
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
LOL. Most you guys are utter retarts. Just sit in front of your computer and type all the shit you want, i don't give a damn.

PAKISTAN ZINDABAD!!!!
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Niet, Федеральная служба безопасности Российской Федерации
I still think that mossad has a significant advantage over any other intelligence agency due to the huge Jewish diaspora
 

7eleven

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
237
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top