I got 44%, is that right?Well done and thanks. Thanks to carrot for checking it for me.
Part 2:
edit: just saw sy123's solution, nvm
I got 44%, is that right?Well done and thanks. Thanks to carrot for checking it for me.
Part 2:
Did you add up the sector and the two segments? If so then I may have made a silly mistakeI got 44%, is that right?
edit: just saw sy123's solution, nvm
The question says the percentage of the pitch *not* visible, so does that mean you minus your final answer from 1?a) Call the centre O (for part iii)
Dotted lines are sight lines.
b) 2 lookout towers needed for whole pitch
c)
Refer to diagrams
S refers to sector
Seg refers to segment
Oh thats true oops. Then yeah obviously yours is correct then (dem silly mistakes)The question says the percentage of the pitch *not* visible, so does that mean you minus your final answer from 1?
nice solution btw
i got 10.90%.Did you add up the sector and the two segments? If so then I may have made a silly mistake
You are correct, and my method is correct I made a wrong calculation in the calculator, recalculated and got what you goti got 10.90%.
44% is way too much, remember it's how much is NOT visible by one tower.
Nice workYou are correct, and my method is correct I made a wrong calculation in the calculator, recalculated and got what you got
yeah thisYou are correct, and my method is correct I made a wrong calculation in the calculator, recalculated and got what you got
I forgot to write my reasoning for this, but if the situation is like this, are we allowed to assume that the stationary point is a maximum since there is no minimum area (A=0 min)Substitute into f''(x), note that r is positive.
No, you MUST always prove maximum/minimum regardless if it says so.I forgot to write my reasoning for this, but if the situation is like this, are we allowed to assume that the stationary point is a maximum since there is no minimum area (A=0 min)
Am I allowed to say this and not differentiate? Such a pain to do it again
This. In 2U they just say "...and justify your answer".No, you MUST always prove maximum/minimum regardless if it says so.
When dealing with Trigonometry and any sort of measure (including area), ALWAYS use Radians.How do you know if something for Simpsons rule should be In rads or not?for eg look at hsc 2000 7b thnks!
When doing any calculus (differentiation or integration) with trig function you use radians. Because degrees are not a linear measurement.How do you know if something for Simpsons rule should be In rads or not?for eg look at hsc 2000 7b thnks!
Look at the standard integrals sheet.How do I integrate secxtanx dx?..... The answer is secx but I don't know to get to it.
Just know basic algebra and the definition of first principles and you should be good to go, on a 2U level they probably wont ask stuff involving substitutions (unless they give it to you), but who knows maybe at the start of Q16 a decent 3 marks to a hard first principles question.Are you guys gonna bother studying differentiating from first principles? Ceeeeeebs.............