Kurosaki
True Fail Kid
Cambridge is one of my favorites, but it's too big for me to carry lol( i have an old edition)Its Cambridge.
Cambridge is one of my favorites, but it's too big for me to carry lol( i have an old edition)Its Cambridge.
Mm ok. But first you are my major obstacle XD. I don't even do that much work on it tbh, I focus more on my English haha. I've heard that u're quite the English wizard ur self (strong HP fan u must be XD)? Thanks for the confidence though XDKurosaki, you'll definitely beat me in 3U and 4U. Mainly because I don't devote all my time to the subject and I'm just not gifted at the subject.
If you want a real challenge, try to surpass Realise or something
I'm not really a HP fan nor am I a fan of books. My English is alright, for a person who doesn't indulge in books, nothing of brilliance or anything.Mm ok. But first you are my major obstacle XD. I don't even do that much work on it tbh, I focus more on my English haha. I've heard that u're quite the English wizard ur self (strong HP fan u must be XD)? Thanks for the confidence though XD
ahh kk thx thats 1 less question to ask my teacher lolOk. Now.inscribef triangle ota in a circle, since ota = 90 degrees( tangent perpendicular)
We can safely say that's OA is a diameter yes?
Now PO=PT
Equal radii of circle
Therefore angle pot equals angled PTo
Therefore alpha= 90 mini s half alpha since we have established that beta is half alpha in my previous work.
Solve for alpha sub in identities for beta and gamma involving alpha to get beta and gamma, which I put in my first post concerning this question . Can't put it any simpler without more time
ahh kk thxHint: construct AC and use the angle in alternate segment theorem.
yr 12 camb 3u chapter 9e question 3dWhat exercise in Cambridge was that from? I still have to do hw from that chapter two terms ago haha (haven't started)
dat sarcasmKaze is a child prodigy
For a.i.can someone tell me what type of reasoning proof do I need for a)i) ? I can't seem to find any reasoning for this case :/
Thanks
Ohhh thanks aysceFor a.i.
Notice how you know that angle PTA = angle BTQ (Vertically opposite angles)
Since there are two diameters in the individual circles, we can deduce that angle APT = angle TQB = 90 degrees (90 degrees in a semi-circle)
The remaining angles: angle PAT = angle TBQ since the others are equal.
Therefore, PAT is similar to QBT since they are equiangular.
====================
The angle sign isn't working for me.
angle PTA = angle ATB (vertically opposite angles)can someone tell me what type of reasoning proof do I need for a)i) ? I can't seem to find any reasoning for this case :/
Thanks
yea i kno im blind and stoopidlol kaze
angle PTA = angle ATB (vertically opposite angles)
construct PA and BQ and notice that AT and QB are diameters of the circles since they pass through the origin (o)
so angle APT= angle TQ=09
therefore the triangles are similar (equiangular)
if only i realised earlier how precious time isJust keep practicing, you have plenty of time
this time in year 10 I used signpost instead of Cambridge to learn all of circle geo and eventually I could do quite a lot of the Ext 2 problems back then through angle chasing
You'll be fine