New dutch laws regarding "multiculturalism" (1 Viewer)

[hayabusaboston]

This was an article written by:
Pieter Schoeman
Site Materials Controller
Engineering and Projects Company
Moma Sands Expansiuon Project
Mozambique,
mobile (+258)84385-8028

Here is what he wrote:

"Go Dutch! but why wait until 2013?

The Netherlands, where six per cent of the population is now Muslim, is scrapping multiculturalism.

The Dutch government says it will abandon the long standing model of multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel society within the netherlands.

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: 'The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people'

In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role.

With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.

The letter continues: 'A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens'

It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands.

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants. For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants who ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants because, according to Donner; 'It is not the government's job to integrate immigrants'

The government will introduce new legislation that outlaws forced marriages and will also impose tougher measures against Muslim immigrants who lower their chances of employment by the way they dress.

More specifically, the government will impose a ban on face-covering, Islamic burqas as of January 1, 2013.

Holland has done that whole liberal thing, and realised-maybe too late- that creating a nation of tribes will kill the nation itself

The future of Australia, the USA, UK and Canada may well be read here.

READERS NOTE: Muslim immigrants leave their countries of birth because of civil and political unrest 'CREATED BY THE VERY NATURE OF THEIR CULTURE'

Countries like Holland, Canada, the USA UK and Australia have an established way of life that actually works, so why embrace the unworkable? If Muslims do not wish to accept another culture, the answer is simple, 'STAY WHERE YOU ARE!!"

This gives a whole new meaning to the term; 'Dutch Courage'-Unfortunately Australian, USA, UK and Canadian politicians don't have the guts to do the same. There's a whole lot of truth here!!!

ELECTION 2013 IS COMING
A Nation of Sheep, Breeds a Government of Wolves!
PASS THIS ON!!!

Let's Take a Stand!
Borders:Closed!
Language:English only!
Culture:English Constitution, is the Bill of Rights!
Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!
NO freebies to:Non-Citizens!

Only 86% will send this on. Should be a 100%. What will you do? Tip toe amongst the tulips?"





As you can see, this was based on an email circulating around, I just typed it up here for you from a hardcopy.

So yea, Discuss.

 

[townie]

Seems pretty nutty to me

 

[fatboi]

Seems fine to me. Countries are free to establish what their ideal society is and forbid immigration of people who do not meet this standard.

 

[Lolsmith]

Seems fine to me. Countries are free to establish what their ideal society is and forbid immigration of people who do not meet this standard.

sounds like you really want a final solution to this immigration problem

 

[Lolsmith]

It seems like the Dutch are going about finding the answer to their Islamic question in the wrong way

 

[townie]

So I've been researching. I can only find webpage a quoting the original source material posted here, I can't find any (extensive) corroborating stories/articles. Is this even legit? The most I can find is that in 2008 they made it so people wanting to immigrate (who weren't part of the EU) had to pass a test on Dutch society and language.

 

[hayabusaboston]

townie, my dad just printed it off from his email and left it on the table, I found and read it and posted it on here. If you're wondering about if its legit, call the guy, his mobile number is listed lol.

 

[fatboi]

Look townzilla and cocksmith

My issue isn't immigration or religion. My issue isn't religious symbols (imo they should either all be allowed or all banned, your pic.). My issue is people who immigrate to another country to exploit oppertunities which don't exist in their own, but do not accept fundamental cultural and social beliefs which prevents integration and productivity. The premise of the article isc correct, all immigrants seek greener pastures for their changes. Consequently all immigrants should accept fundamental cultural beliefs and ones necessary for employment (I would say generalised views of freedom and freedom of speech, tolerance of religion/race/populance etc to be essential) and learn the language at a minimum. This doesn't mean get rid of their culture, it just means adapt to one.

 

[hayabusaboston]

Look townzilla and cocksmith

My issue isn't immigration or religion. My issue isn't religious symbols (imo they should either all be allowed or all banned, your pic.). My issue is people who immigrate to another country to exploit oppertunities which don't exist in their own, but do not accept fundamental cultural and social beliefs which prevents integration and productivity. The premise of the article isc correct, all immigrants seek greener pastures for their changes. Consequently all immigrants should accept fundamental cultural beliefs and ones necessary for employment (I would say generalised views of freedom and freedom of speech, tolerance of religion/race/populance etc to be essential) and learn the language at a minimum. This doesn't mean get rid of their culture, it just means adapt to one.

THANKYOU, one person who agrees haha

 

[fatboi]

u tard

i dont agree with the article but i agree with the premise

i don't think 6% of one type of people is an invasion by any means

 

[TheGreatest99.95]

i like this and personally think Australia should do this. fucken sick of people who come to australia and complain and abuse their privileges. unfortunately now, there are some suburbs you can visit and they are already filled with certain races. multiculturalism doesnt work, cultures mix with their own

 

[hayabusaboston]

i like this and personally think Australia should do this. fucken sick of people who come to australia and complain and abuse their privileges. unfortunately now, there are some suburbs you can visit and they are already filled with certain races. multiculturalism doesnt work, cultures mix with their own

Yay a supporter!

forward this man, to all the people you can, on ur email. Copy paste into a document and mass forward. Maybe even forward to some government official.

 

[Sy123]

i like this and personally think Australia should do this. fucken sick of people who come to australia and complain and abuse their privileges. unfortunately now, there are some suburbs you can visit and they are already filled with certain races. multiculturalism doesnt work, cultures mix with their own

I hate to draw this argument.

But what made it justifiable for the Anglo people to invade the Aboriginal land?
Why can't immigrants invade and impose their culture upon anglo's?

I'm not talking about the morality of the invasion, I'm talking about how the perceived invasion of immigrants from other backgrounds coming into Australia is indeed a more civil and humane way of taking control than the war on the Aboriginals by the settlers.

 

[hayabusaboston]

I hate to draw this argument.

But what made it justifiable for the Anglo people to invade the Aboriginal land?
Why can't immigrants invade and impose their culture upon anglo's?

I'm not talking about the morality of the invasion, I'm talking about how the perceived invasion of immigrants from other backgrounds coming into Australia is indeed a more civil and humane way of taking control than the war on the Aboriginals by the settlers.

Simple
In crude biological terms, survival of the fittest. Anglo humans were technologically superior to aboriginals, they wanted aboriginals land, lets all be honest here, anglo's were more powerful, so there isnt exactly anything aboriginals could do to stop invasion lol. THE SIMPLE RULING PRINCIPLE OF BIOLOGY ON EARTH: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST!

 

[hayabusaboston]

In sync with this thread (Kinda):
South african "V for vendetta" type thing is going on:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KelccaIbibI

 

[Sy123]

Simple
In crude biological terms, survival of the fittest. Anglo humans were technologically superior to aboriginals, they wanted aboriginals land, lets all be honest here, anglo's were more powerful, so there isnt exactly anything aboriginals could do to stop invasion lol. THE SIMPLE RULING PRINCIPLE OF BIOLOGY ON EARTH: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST!

But really, aren't the most intelligent people of today's kids not Anglo? Its now the asian kids who are winning in terms of education. It's only a stereotype because it consistently is fulfilled.

What if in the end you anglos are just not as smart as the asians, by survival of the fittest you should allow asians to swamp Australia right?

 

[fatboi]

I hate to draw this argument.

But what made it justifiable for the Anglo people to invade the Aboriginal land?
Why can't immigrants invade and impose their culture upon anglo's?

I'm not talking about the morality of the invasion, I'm talking about how the perceived invasion of immigrants from other backgrounds coming into Australia is indeed a more civil and humane way of taking control than the war on the Aboriginals by the settlers.

ur argument makes no sense

if they could, the original owners of this land would repel a cultural invasion, do you agree? yes. ofc you do.

so it makes no sense to ask how it's justifiable, when no matter what, a culture will act to attempt to preserve itself.

think before u type

 

[fatboi]

But really, aren't the most intelligent people of today's kids not Anglo? Its now the asian kids who are winning in terms of education. It's only a stereotype because it consistently is fulfilled.

What if in the end you anglos are just not as smart as the asians, by survival of the fittest you should allow asians to swamp Australia right?

totally missed the point cause you're arguing with stupid dickwad haya over there

no one cares if asians top all the white kids

but you will note that many of those students have to speak english to do so, and ultimately generally do well at uni/end up employed. So in essence they are not a detriment to the country and are, at the very least to some degree, quite integrated into culture in terms of core values.

 

[Sy123]

ur argument makes no sense

if they could, the original owners of this land would repel a cultural invasion, do you agree? yes. ofc you do.

so it makes no sense to ask how it's justifiable, when no matter what, a culture will act to attempt to preserve itself.

think before u type

Look at the above post, asian kids perform better than anglo kids, future society will mostly have succeeding Asian/other background people, no matter how much anglo's try and preserve their culture it will inevitably get destroyed (hopefully)

 

[townie]

Khorne I agree that people should accept the culture and values of the place they seek to settle in (up to a point), but I don't think accepting one culture necessarily means that they have to give up another. We (well most of us) accept the premise of bi-sexuality, why then not being bi-cultural.