• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
110
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

A way to come up with really complicated integrals that can be done using elementary functions: make up a complicated function and differentiate it :D
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

A way to come up with really complicated integrals that can be done using elementary functions: make up a complicated function and differentiate it :D
That's usually how integrals are made up lols. But you should be careful because not all functions are integratable, but nearly all are differentiatable.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

To me that final integral seems harder than the first...may be wrong though.
For the cot one, is it a really obscure substitution of the difficulty of like x = (1-u)/(1+u)?
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Not the way I did it.
I am guessing I need to multiply 1 in a clever way, no?

I need to find a way to prove that:



I am considering some sort of periodicity argument but I don't think that might work.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Well I did it by manipulating the x to something.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

I am guessing I need to multiply 1 in a clever way, no?

I need to find a way to prove that:



I am considering some sort of periodicity argument but I don't think that might work.
Ok here is my attempt at proving the above equality.

We can establish that:



By simply using the substitution 2x = u

And since sin(2x) is symmetrical about pi/4 from x=0 to x=pi/2. Hence (by taking the integral of ln(sin(2x)) from pi/4 to pi/2)



===========

This relates to the problem, because by integrating xcot x by parts:



Taking that specific integral on the RHS, then applying that definite integrals property (x) -> (a-x), then adding and log properties, we arrive at:



Since the integrals are equal, then

====

I think that is valid, the only fishy thing maybe is the symmetry arguments but I think that's fine. EDIT: Actually a simple substitution pi - x = u for ln(sin(x)) is sufficient to prove the symmetry for ln(sin(x)) and x = pi/2 - u for ln(sin(2x)).
So I am absolutely sure its all correct.

Now what's the elegant method!?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

We should have an integration party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top