• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

The substitution (u^2-1)^2 can be modified slightly to make the integral much more easier. Its close though.
Actually the integral became just 4∫(u^4 - u^2) du - about as simple as it gets. The messy part was the ensuing substitution. I've checked my answer by differentiation and it works.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Actually the integral became just 4∫(u^4 - u^2) du - about as simple as it gets. The messy part was the ensuing substitution. I've checked my answer by differentiation and it works.
Yep, I was thinking of (u-1)^2 which is slightly longer.

===========

 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Personally, I would have made the substitution x=u^2.

As a result, you get the integral of u*sqrt(1+u), which is straight-forward to evaluate, and the substitution back to x is quick.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon
















Just learnt Integration by parts and Latex so probably wrong.
Well yeah if its right its right, nice work.

Alternatively the substitution u=1+x^3 and the split of the first x^5 into x^3 and x^2 yields a faster method.
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Well yeah if its right its right, nice work.

Alternatively the substitution u=1+x^3 and the split of the first x^5 into x^3 and x^2 yields a faster method.


Yeah I did split it. u= x^2. It is pretty obvious with integration by parts though as you need to get rid of the coefficient as efficiently as possible.

I usually have problems more with partial fractions and splitting the numerator though.

I can't think of a really hard question atm.
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



I could not think of something creative at this point of time.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



I could not think of something creative at this point of time.
What you can do is consider areas. First split the integral into:



Now if we consider the integrals separately and consider the areas bound by the curves:





Similarly for inverse tan:





Adding the two integrals together gives:

 
Last edited:

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

What you can do is consider areas. First split the integral into:



Now if we consider the integrals separately and consider the areas bound by the curves:





Similarly for inverse tan:





Adding the two integrals together gives:



Edit: Never Mind you were right. Nice Work.
 
Last edited:

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

What you can do is consider areas. First split the integral into:



Now if we consider the integrals separately and consider the areas bound by the curves:





Similarly for inverse tan:





Adding the two integrals together gives:


Nice work. That is right and I got the same answer doing it the long way.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



I assure you the numbers are not arbitrary.
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



I assure you the numbers are not arbitrary.





Used partial fractions but got freakishly large numbers (like 500000).
I am guessing you don't use partial fractions?
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon






Used partial fractions but got freakishly large numbers (like 500000).
I am guessing you don't use partial fractions?
Yeah I didn't use partial fractions, I recommend a substitution.
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

doing partial fractions on that sounds worse than death LOL
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

hmmm for Sy's question i experimented with x=1/3sectheta but to no avail :( was getting very close until something stuffed up with the limits :/ i got sec (pi/2)
 
Last edited:

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

I think maybe tanx or cotx are best as they represent a way of eliminating infinity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top