yes supposed to be in theory, doesn't work out in practice.
It's a student paper, how is it not in the "public arena." Anything that's published no matter how small shall not be restricted in anyway.
im talking about europe duhhh
So a paper funded and run by students at an institution funded by public money which is located on what was public land and which was established by an act of parliament isn't in the public arena? OK.
The students who wrote this student newspaper, agreed to that uni's policy. If I went into an RSL and started handing out papers and started talking shit about the Anzacs, that RSL has every right to tell me to GTFO. However if it was outside that RSL on the street then it's fine. Get my point yet? Private vs Public
private schools get public money yet their still private schools
ANU isn't private though, it's a public university
And i think those are abhorrent crimes, and Saudi has an outdated and fundamentalist application of sharia law that is not in line with what many Muslims think and is considered quite controversial even within the Muslim community. Sharia law itself is considered a redundant practice by many Muslims due to the fact that a) by its very definition as a religious law it excludes other religions and thus cannot apply universally and b) because there isn't any agreement on what it actually should be, whether it should integrate just the Qur'an or the Hadith as well etc. In fact many facets of "shariah law" that have been applied in some African nations etc. have little to do with Islam at all but have more of a cultural base.
82% of Egyptian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
but did they agree to adhere to university policy, Australian Press Guidelines etc. when they published the magazine?
lol that really means nothing as the term "strict Sharia" is ridiculously nebulous to the point pretty much no one can agree as to what it is
It's funny how people babble on about sharia courts in france and the UK when they're just an alternative arbitration system instead of an ACTUAL court.
point I was about to make. They agreed to that uni's code of conduct. if they were students who published something that wasn't a student newspaper (or whatever) then the uni has no say, but this wasn't the case.
They may have but
Brett still thinks that his "research" counts as credible, the poor thing.
Well derr. If it were up to me people would be able to publish and say whatever the fuck they want anywhere. However I do believe in private contract and property rights
1) fair enough, i'm not too familiar with how it works so you are probs correct on this
