• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Comparison of Maths Ext 2 books (1 Viewer)

Inverse

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Fitzpatrick does have worked solutions now, but as mentioned, a lot of questions aren't exam style and there are still errors in the solutions. Some questions are just useless. Personally, I think its good practise though some areas aren't covered in detail (e.g complex vectors and roots of unity).
But hands down Cambridge and Terry Lee 4u - would recommend those two particularly! :)
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Na Cambridge 4u is not good. Terry Or Ptel and Coroneos has range of exam style questions
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Na Cambridge 4u is not good. Terry Or Ptel and Coroneos has range of exam style questions
Terry lee doesnt really... Cambridge is good for building basics, terry lee is alright but sometimes he goes nuts and puts in totally irrelevant shit. I did enjoy his volumes and integration chapters though :)
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Cambridge is good for building basics
The exact opposite of this. Cambridge does almost no 'building' of concepts. In each exercise there are a couple of basic questions, then its straight into the hard stuff.
 

Makematics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1,829
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
The exact opposite of this. Cambridge does almost no 'building' of concepts. In each exercise there are a couple of basic questions, then its straight into the hard stuff.
Really? Apart from maybe complex numbers, i didnt really find this to be the case... For example, all of the volumes questions and integration questions were easy difficulty
 

iBibah

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,374
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Really? Apart from maybe complex numbers, i didnt really find this to be the case... For example, all of the volumes questions and integration questions were easy difficulty
Maybe you're just too beast for these "deep-end" questions ;)
 

obliviousninja

(╯°□°)╯━︵ ┻━┻ - - - -
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
6,624
Location
Sydney Girls
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
I liked cheating in Terry Lee. huehue. lol jks...only did so when I was completely lost.
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
In terms of topics, I personally recommend:
Coroneous for Complex Numbers - this one has by far the most challenging questions for complex numbers.

Patel for Integration (I really like this book in general in the way it splits the topics up), I borrowed it from the library and loved how it summarised the course, but this topic I reckon is its strength. As many have noticed, this one is also the best for "notes" in my opinion.

Fitzpatrick is terrible for Complex Numbers; and is mixed for Conics (not much moderate stuff). Some of the conics stuff in Fitzpatrick is good if you need a challenge, although the newest version waters down it a bit, and the "multiple choice" questions as well as the ones before it in the new version are just bad.
The best section is that for some parts of mechanics: conical pendulum and banked tracks part of mechanics. I personally would recommend the older version of Fitzpatrick if you want a harder book. (edit: maybe not)

Cambridge and Terry Lee are two good all-rounders for most topics, especially the latter. Cambridge is good for questions but not for learning the concepts, use anything else.

The old Arnold-Arnold book apparently has some good reduction questions for integration, as afore mentioned.
My school also used Couchman and various other old textbooks as well at times.

Also the MANSW solutions for the older HSC exams are your best bet for pre-2000 exams, and Terry Lee's are also good for the years that it is available for.
 
Last edited:

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Really ? I found the older version of Fitzpatrick bad compared to the newer one?
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Really ? I found the older version of Fitzpatrick bad compared to the newer one?
The new one has multiple choice questions which are pointless; and the summaries are sometimes lacking (although at least the new version has them). I think that Patel is the best book of the lot for revision excluding the exercises. (He also wrote the Excel book which is reasonable)
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Patel's textbook was my main textbook. I extracted a ton out of it.

But it's pathetic for graphs and it's inequalities are biased on the algebraic ones.
-------------
Apart from M/C new Fitzpatrick has been argued by several people to be superior to old
-------------
Edit: I'm joking. It's not pathetic for graphs. But it goes into a bit too much with it. Most of the time the HSC gives you an arbitrary graph to make alterations; not make you do function of a function etc with KNOWN functions e.g. e^(sinx) as opposed to e^f(x) where y=f(x) gives you this random graph
 
Last edited:

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Patel's textbook was my main textbook. I extracted a ton out of it.

But it's pathetic for graphs and it's inequalities are biased on the algebraic ones.
-------------
Apart from M/C new Fitzpatrick has been argued by several people to be superior to old
-------------
Edit: I'm joking. It's not pathetic for graphs. But it goes into a bit too much with it. Most of the time the HSC gives you an arbitrary graph to make alterations; not make you do function of a function etc with KNOWN functions e.g. e^(sinx) as opposed to e^f(x) where y=f(x) gives you this random graph
Would agree mostly; my school breezed mostly over the graphs section however. The new fitzpatrick is better in most areas, than the old.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top