• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

General Thoughts (2 Viewers)

bangladesh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
1,027
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I think it went quite well. Except i got fucked over by the last question in chem of art. Either than that it was really good i think! The questions were non generic which is good and there was a fair amount of calculation (probs around 25% at least) which is also good.
Hoping for a raw of 88-93 Would that align to 95-6?
 

andybandy

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
294
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
done some sillies, but over all it was pretty good, not the best i could've of done though
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I think it went quite well. Except i got fucked over by the last question in chem of art. Either than that it was really good i think! The questions were non generic which is good and there was a fair amount of calculation (probs around 25% at least) which is also good.
Hoping for a raw of 88-93 Would that align to 95-6?
An 88 last year aligned to 95 I think last year. In my opinion the cut off will increase this year so, you're probably looking at around 95-96. But saying that I think the markers will not give marks out easily this year
 

bangladesh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
1,027
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
An 88 last year aligned to 95 I think last year. In my opinion the cut off will increase this year so, you're probably looking at around 95-96. But saying that I think the markers will not give marks out easily this year
yeah ofc. chem is always easy but the marking criteria is always quite harsh.
 

blinx96

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
103
Location
Blacktown
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
is the reaction between chlorine and bromine spontaneous (the question in our exam) ?
 

Locus

Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
77
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
it was non-spontaneous according to my calculations. it produced a negative voltage.
is it fine to state that one thing is a stronger oxidant (showing the voltage) than the other instead of teh calculation of Ecell
 

Praer

Active Member
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
352
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
is it fine to state that one thing is a stronger oxidant (showing the voltage) than the other instead of teh calculation of Ecell
That's what I did. And i think this is right
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top