Physics HSC test (2 Viewers)

[blinx96]

anyone care to guess whats in and whats not in tomorrows physics test lols?

I'm pretty sure the loudspeaker and how it uses the motor effect won't be there tomorrow (Since they had a 5 mark question on it last year -.- )

 

[Menomaths]

magelev?

 

[RealiseNothing]

magelev?

pls no

 

[blinx96]

maglev trains? how many marks u reckon?

 

[Menomaths]

no idea but they haven't been asked before (i think?) and while I was reading this thread I switched tabs to my notes and maglev trains was the first thing I saw so this may be a sign...

 

[blinx96]

no idea but they haven't been asked before (i think?) and while I was reading this thread I switched tabs to my notes and maglev trains was the first thing I saw so this may be a sign...

i don't mind them... its kinda straightforward lol

 

[Randox]

Since they did 5 marks on loudspeaker last year, would they ask 5 on the galvanometer?

 

[superSAIyan2]

models of light hasnt been asked in a while. so maybe a long response on photoelectric effect and einstein.

 

[Menomaths]

Since they did 5 marks on loudspeaker last year, would they ask 5 on the galvanometer?

They did loudspeakers..AND motor effect if you think about it so probably not

 

[Duxify]

Not much of an opinion on modules 1 and 2.

For module 3 they seemed to go quite heavy on semiconductors and charged particles in magnetic fields last year... So prob due for something nasty on photoelectric effect/quantised radiation. Most people tend to like superconductors and theres only so much that can be asked on them.

 

[panda15]

Not much of an opinion on modules 1 and 2.

For module 3 they seemed to go quite heavy on semiconductors and charged particles in magnetic fields last year... So prob due for something nasty on photoelectric effect/quantised radiation. Most people tend to like superconductors and theres only so much that can be asked on them.

Oh dear god no.

 

[xxcc]

hopefully no obscure questions on the standard model for q to q

 

[panda15]

hopefully no obscure questions on the standard model for q to q

I reckon we're due. It hasn't really been asked since 2009. But I really hope I'm wrong. Standard Model is my only weak part of Q to Q.

 

[hayabusaboston]

I reckon we're due. It hasn't really been asked since 2009. But I really hope I'm wrong. Standard Model is my only weak part of Q to Q.

If there's something on black body/quantisation/photoelectric effect and einstein and planck's contributions to revolutionising views of light/physics etc, then im all set, got full marks for questions like that which were in my trial

What im hoping for as well is something on revolutionising atomic structure view from Q2Q, pauli, heisenberg etc, but that was asked last yr in something about atomic processes so not sure they'll do it again. De Broglie's wave stuff would also be lovely to have

 

[Dan895]

Bloody Medical Physics, I wish my class did Q2Q.
Hoping for challenging core questions but easy Option

 

[xxcc]

I reckon we're due. It hasn't really been asked since 2009. But I really hope I'm wrong. Standard Model is my only weak part of Q to Q.

Guess its time to revise some more on the standard model.

 

[Web Addict]

hopefully no obscure questions on the standard model for q to q

There's not much on the Standard Model. I wonder how we're supposed to write around two pages if the Board of Studies asks us a question about it.

 

[mtzedd]

I'm thinking Manhattan project for Q2Q... hasn't it not been asked since 2005?

 

[Web Addict]

I'm thinking Manhattan project for Q2Q... hasn't it not been asked since 2005?

Crap. I hate that dot point. There's too much to memorise.

 

[panda15]

I'm thinking Manhattan project for Q2Q... hasn't it not been asked since 2005?

I think it was asked in 2010 from memory.