Thanks ill take a read.Suggest you have a read of this:
http://community.boredofstudies.org...loyability-whilst-university.html#post6558867
Thanks ill take a read.
Anyone got a answer to my specific question though?
Yes, to some degree, but it may not be the best use of your time. You'll be better than those with a D average and nothing else; but the kid who got a D average and has been treasurer on three boards and done the accounts for the family business has the edge on you.Would a HD average b.com student be more employable than a B.com D average student. If so, to what extent?
Aiming specifically at accounting,finance majors/
D average with part time work for 2 years at coles + some little volunteering > HD average commerce?Yes, to some degree, but it may not be the best use of your time. You'll be better than those with a D average and nothing else; but the kid who got a D average and has been treasurer on three boards and done the accounts for the family business has the edge on you.
I assume 10 being the most and 1 being the least
This. And it might wow the interviewer who had a Credit average (like me). But ultimately your ability to fit in with the organisation and contribute to the achievement of goals is what will determine whether you land a job... and that's the bit where there needs to be linkage between what is on your CV/what you say, and what they're actually looking for.If all else equal then yes, HD average would probably be more employable than D average. However, there are heaps of other variables to consider in reality.
I've never heard of this practice from anyone in industry other than IB/finance which have WAM minimums (as opposed to ranking and binning on WAM) but then in my line of work, WAM isn't the most important criteria.Getting a HD is more employable.
A HR manager at a big 4 bank told me that... They sort out the resumes based on highest to lowest wam.. Then they pick out the HD, D and some C's.... ... and chuck out the passes.
Chucking out is also known as "binning".
This was deloittes. My lecturer used to be a paper shuffler/sorter when he first got in the company.I've never heard of this practice from anyone in industry other than IB/finance which have WAM minimums (as opposed to ranking and binning on WAM) but then in my line of work, WAM isn't the most important criteria.
Deloitte =/= big 4 bank... which makes this even more surprising. But hey, their choice.This was deloittes. My lecturer used to be a paper shuffler/sorter when he first got in the company.
This is srs question.Deloitte =/= big 4 bank... which makes this even more surprising. But hey, their choice.
I've seen high credit averages with pretty much only extracurriculars (and some work experience not related to auditing) get offered positions.This is srs question.
If I get HD in b.com USYD but with absolutely 0 work experience, "some" extra curricular volutneering etc...
What would my chance at big 4 audit with 0 connections/networks.
Interpersonal/Communication is always the most important attribute.I assume 10 being the most and 1 being the least
Pretty sure they were separate examples.Deloitte =/= big 4 bank... which makes this even more surprising. But hey, their choice.
lol no, other way aroundI assume 10 being the most and 1 being the least
Ah yes, had that lecture today.
Look to be brutally honest I don't think a question like this is something that you should be asking. If you are intelligent, and you put in the effort, you will be rewarded with good marks which employers will look highly on. Fixating on getting a particular mark isn't going to do you any favours, it just adds extra stress and in my opinion takes the fun out of learning.This is srs question.
If I get HD in b.com USYD but with absolutely 0 work experience, "some" extra curricular volutneering etc...
What would my chance at big 4 audit with 0 connections/networks.