MedVision ad

HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

so the answer should be e^4.6 which is 99.95 (2dp)
 

Fade1233

Active Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
345
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

I remember doing this question in a trial paper :p. I'll post a solution tomorrow if nobody has solved it yet. Hint: Use a trig-substitution
Similar to BOS 2012 Paper question
 

integral95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
779
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

View attachment 30918, nothing too hard, just tedious.
Next:View attachment 30920



Not sure if i made a mistake there lol, and yeah i know i skipped a lot towards the end.

As for the second part I manipulated the first equation to make it look like the expression in the question and took the summation but i'm not sure what to do there.
 

Speed6

Retired '16
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
2,949
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon




Not sure if i made a mistake there lol, and yeah i know i skipped a lot towards the end.

As for the second part I manipulated the first equation to make it look like the expression in the question and took the summation but i'm not sure what to do there.
Your smart.
 

Fade1233

Active Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
345
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon




Not sure if i made a mistake there lol, and yeah i know i skipped a lot towards the end.

As for the second part I manipulated the first equation to make it look like the expression in the question and took the summation but i'm not sure what to do there.
(2^(2n+1))/(2n+1)(2nCn)= what you had proven.
Doesnt that work?
 
Last edited:

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

here is one from a friend of mine that tests all your MX2 Integration skills
integrate with respect to x
2 ln (1+x/1+x^2)
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

here is one from a friend of mine that tests all your MX2 Integration skills
integrate with respect to x
2 ln (1+x/1+x^2)
?

Just split the log and then parts for each term.
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

?

Just split the log and then parts for each term.
sure, it still tests all your skills even if it doesn't cover everything. I'd didn't say it was going to be hard.
(you have to be able to integrate by parts effectively twice, and trigonometry)
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

sure, it still tests all your skills even if it doesn't cover everything. I'd didn't say it was going to be hard.
(you have to be able to integrate by parts effectively twice, and trigonometry)
From observation (I haven't actually done it yet), the only MX2 technique required is IBP, which is hardly 'all your skills' considering there are perhaps 5-6 other integration techniques in Extension 2.
 

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

yeah there should also be a (2n+1)/2^(2n+1) outside and expand the sigma
 

integral95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
779
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

yeah there should also be a (2n+1)/2^(2n+1) outside and expand the sigma
I don't think yiu can take it outside of sigma since the expression is in terms of n

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk
 

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

in your case, it'll be in terms of 'k' [i.e. (2k+1)/2^(2k+1)], since that's what you chose to represent as the index of summation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top