Fade1233
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2014
- Messages
- 345
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
The triangle inequality tells us
Well clearly r is at least positive since you can't have negative sides (am I missing something else?)On the topic of triangles, heres a nice question I made: View attachment 30967
Why can't r be a fraction?Well clearly r is at least positive since you can't have negative sides (am I missing something else?)
r>1 ??
for part ii
let the sides be a,ar,ar^2
since
the triangle is right-angled then the Pythagoras theorem applies
(assuming r >1, implying ar^2 is the longest side)
a^2r^4= a^2r^2a^2
and then take the positive square root.
well it can hahaWhy can't r be a fraction?
Exactly, you get 2 r values. However question says value of r not values, so I am assuming we have done something wrong in the first part, unless dunjaa has missed out a s in the word valuewell it can haha
I just realised there are 2 sets of solutions
Another case is where a^2 is the longest side instead (where 0<r<1)
And you'd be solving
value(s) hehExactly, you get 2 r values. However question says value of r not values, so I am assuming we have done something wrong in the first part, unless dunjaa has missed out a s in the word value
Oh great it's not the triangular inequality is it.....You got the second part of the question right, but the first part is wrong. Clearly, r>0, but the sides must also obey a condition.
Oh wow hahahahIndeed it is haha
You got the upper bound correct, but the lower bound is not 0
Do you just sub in x=b and x=c, show that P(b) and P(c) equals zero, meaning that (x-b) and (x-c) are both factors, implying that their product, the given quadratic, is a factor?
Yeap exactly what i didDo you just sub in x=b and x=c, show that P(b) and P(c) equals zero, meaning that (x-b) and (x-c) are both factors, implying that their product, the given quadratic, is a factor?