in bold are the parts i highlighted to show how essentially half your post is just saying the other person's opinion is invalid without actually demonstrating how
Those were responses to attacks against me of which you did not demonstrate anything, you accused me
And that isn't half my post
I already told you how your reasoning is circular, you presuppose that meaning has to be universal (no i don't have to define it because you literally say meaning is objective which by definition makes it universal) and then use this to argue that meaning is universal lol.
No, I showed why if by meaning we mean anything at all, then it must be "universal"
Because if you say that the meaning of life is what you make of it, then any "meaning" is valid, which takes all substance out of the word
It is convenient for you because what I have come to realise is yoou just repeat it over and over till people get sick of arguing with you and just give up which is what I'm on the verge of doing right now lol, it's honestly not worth the effort if you're so adamant in refusing to acknowledge the flaws in what you said.
yeah thanks for trying to attack me and show how illogical I am, without any proof or evidence
lol illogical moslems~~
can't understand relativism amirite
And lol I did and that dichotomy is exactly the same as the one i said you established. It is EXACTLY the same haha.
Now you're just being dishonest, you had in your "dichotomy", an inference to worshiping God as the means of life, but I did not do the same
So its not the same lol haha
Not to mention you still haven't actually provided any substance to what you said because you throw around words like "valuable" and "valid" without defining them by any objective measure.
I showed you what I meant by valuable and valid, and you choose to ignore me
Also I bolded where you attack me and say my opinion is valid without giving any reasons
Much more than half it seems
