• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

lol a 100% magic done by substitution. anyone can find a way to play this magic:



Let u = ln x. So x = eu ⇒ dx = eu du.
When x = 1, u = 0, and when x = 3, u = ln 3.

.

Now, using the fact that , we have



Since eln 3 - u = eln 3.e-u = 3e-u, we have







(multiplying the numerator and denominator of the integrand of the second integral on the RHS by e2u )





This is pretty easy to integrate now. Let v = e-u ⇒ -dv = e-u du and change the limits of integration, so











 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Do you mean a substitution that does it all in one go?

The only thing I can think of at the moment is:







Where the dots are a tan inverse integral which is easy to compute

Is that what you were looking for?








 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Times top and bottom by x^5

let u = x^6 and you have a standard inverse tan integral
Well, you actually end up with a partial fractions thing that yields a log, as the denominator becomes , numerator is 1/6.
 

integral95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
779
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Well, you actually end up with a partial fractions thing that yields a log, as the denominator becomes , numerator is 1/6.
My bad :p

is there a faster way by any chance or was that your intended method?
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Well, my method was to factorise the denominator as and then use the substitution you said, which gets you to the same integral as your method, so pretty much the same method.
 

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Improper integral again?



While for the last one, singularity is inevitable, you must split the interval into two pars and take respective limits.
 
Last edited:

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

As for improper integral, consider the following statement, is it true or false? Justify your answer:
 

SquareZ

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
14
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

False because the function has an asymptote at x=0, thus the integral with boundaries which passes through the asymptote cannot be evaluated.
 

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

the integrand has a discontinuity (either a finite jump or infinity) in the interval of integration or at either endpoint of the interval, like tangent of x in any interval containing \pi/2, 1/x in any interval containing 0
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

the integrand has a discontinuity (either a finite jump or infinity) in the interval of integration or at either endpoint of the interval, like tangent of x in any interval containing \pi/2, 1/x in any interval containing 0
But the curve 1/(2+sin x) is continuous over the interval [0,pi]?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top