DepressedPenguino
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 363
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2015
Are you sure this pedigree is correct? Because if two non-affected parents produce an affected offspring (In this case, Gary and Greta are the unaffected parents, and Karen is the affected offspring), the trait is recessive because one of the parents must hold the recessive trait. So let's assume any of the parents, Gary or Greta are "Bb", because they can't be "BB" (If one of them was BB, then none of the children would have the trait) and they can't be "bb" (If one of them was bb, then they would be shaded, but none of the parents, Gary or Greta are shaded). So if Gary or Greta are 'Bb" then Karen should not be affected because if you use a punnet square, the first child in F1 would not be affected.View attachment 32044
q: State the probability of a second child of greta and gary inherting the allele
I dont think there is a problem with the pedigree. Cant both gary and greta be Bb? So 25% of their offspring is affected which Karen is part of.Are you sure this pedigree is correct? Because if two non-affected parents produce an affected offspring (In this case, Gary and Greta are the unaffected parents, and Karen is the affected offspring), the trait is recessive because one of the parents must hold the recessive trait. So let's assume any of the parents, Gary or Greta are "Bb", because they can't be "BB" (If one of them was BB, then none of the children would have the trait) and they can't be "bb" (If one of them was bb, then they would be shaded, but none of the parents, Gary or Greta are shaded). So if Gary or Greta are 'Bb" then Karen should not be affected because if you use a punnet square, the first child in F1 would not be affected.
If both parents were Bb, then the first child would be BB but Karen has to be bb because Karen is affected.I dont think there is a problem with the pedigree. Cant both gary and greta be Bb? So 25% of their offspring is affected which Karen is part of.
Nop lolAh, the answer is 0%, am I right?
It has to be, because if one of the parents were BB, then none of the children would be affected, so as a result, both parents have to be Bb, this results in BB, Bb, Bb, bb, and since the child already has the disease, then the next child would definitely not inherit the disease so there's a 0% chance of the next child inheriting (if that makes sense).Nop lol
Enantiostasis is the maintenance of metabolic and physiological functions in response to variations in the environment. An example of a plant would be the mangroves. Their adaptations include salt excretion, (salt is excreted from the underside of the leaves), salt exclusion (salt is excluded from special glands in the leaves) and salt accumulation (salt is accumulated on old leaves that drop off).Heres an easy one, what is enantiostasis? And provide an example of a plant that undergoes this as well as its adaptations.
Which year?HSC Question: During protein synthesis, mRNA is translated into sequences of amino acids. How many amino acids are coded for in this molecule?
Answer is 2 but why? Is it because there is a codon and an anti-codon so that makes it two? Can someone explain for me?
Honestly not sure, I've got the 2008 success one edition and it has questions from modules in order and the past papers, this question is from the modules in order and it doesn't say the year if you know what I mean.Which year?
Is that the exact wording of the question that u posted?Honestly not sure, I've got the 2008 success one edition and it has questions from modules in order and the past papers, this question is from the modules in order and it doesn't say the year if you know what I mean.
Yeah, question is worded exactly from the book.Is that the exact wording of the question that u posted?
Well the question is wrong in the first place.. mRNA does not get translated into amino acids and the number of amino acids that a mRNA strand codes for depends on the no. of codons that it hasYeah, question is worded exactly from the book.
Isn't an amino acid basically mRNAs binded with tRNAs? As in the codon of a mRNA binds with an anti-codon of a tRNA, and this basically forms an amino acid?Well the question is wrong in the first place.. mRNA does not get translated into amino acids and the number of amino acids that a mRNA strand codes for depends on the no. of codons that it has
Nop. Aminocyl- tRNA synthetase binds an amino acid to the tRNA with the specific anticondon. The tRNA joins its anticodon with the corresponding codon of the mRNA and this process repeats with the amino acid molecule(s) being transferred from the previous tRNA to the nextIsn't an amino acid basically mRNAs binded with tRNAs? As in the codon of a mRNA binds with an anti-codon of a tRNA, and this basically forms an amino acid?