Drsoccerball
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,650
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2015
Wot... so he's wrong?It's kind of like quantum mechanics - when you look at the first marble you change the answer!
No, I'm saying that if the colour of the first ball had been noted, then the answer would be different.Wot... so he's wrong?
What would the answer be if it was noted?No, I'm saying that if the colour of the first ball had been noted, then the answer would be different.
It wasn't noted, so he is correct.
Different, and it would depend on what the colour was.What would the answer be if it was noted?
its 1/2 ? assuming the first female is locked inA woman has two children, one of whom is a girl born on a Friday.
What is the probability that her other child is also female?
Bonus: Consider this same problem with "born on a Friday" replaced by another random condition that holds with probability q. Explain the results of how the original question depends on the parameter q.
Nope, there's lots of famous probability Q's like these (famous because the answers are counterintuitive for most people).its 1/2 ? assuming the first female is locked in
I don't think the condition matters does it?A woman has two children, one of whom is a girl born on a Friday.
What is the probability that her other child is also female?
Bonus: Consider this same problem with "born on a Friday" replaced by another random condition that holds with probability q. Explain the results of how the original question depends on the parameter q.
It would be 1/2 if you were told that a particular child (say the first-born) was a girl born on a Friday.I don't think the condition matters does it?
Since theres four possibilities (boy girl) (girl boy) (boy boy) (girl girl)
Then its 1/4
But id still think it is 1/2....
But we are told that she was born on friday so the first part would be 1/2 right?It would be 1/2 if you were told that a particular child (say the first-born) was a girl born on a Friday.
It is not 1/2 because you are not told which child - only that one of them satisfies this condition.
Not sure we needed the Friday part though - it would still have been a valid and equally unintuitive question without that.
No it's not. We are not told that "she" is born on a Friday, we are told that one of them is born on a Friday.But we are told that she was born on friday so the first part would be 1/2 right?
If anyone is having difficulty, you would probably have a better chance of seeing the concept if the question was rephrased in terms of counting.
Focusing on the case without the Friday info:
"Of all the two child families with at least one girl, what fraction actually have two girls?"
Well - yes - and that probably helps with the latter part of the question.
So whats the second part of the question asking us to find ...Well - yes - and that probably helps with the latter part of the question.
But here its just a matter of listing out the cases: GG, GB, BG, BB
and then eliminating the BB case.
Well for starters, that wasn't the actual question. Can you answer the question with the Friday info included?So whats the second part of the question asking us to find ...