So... you don't understand it or is it wrong? At least tell me how could I change it to improve the answer.
If your reason is that crops "absorb" CO2, then your not really reducing greenhouse emissions, since both ethanol and hydrocarbons combust to form CO2. So the CO2 in either case will be "absorbed" by the plants.So... you don't understand it or is it wrong? At least tell me how could I change it to improve the answer.
Is there another way to word this more properly because this is the idea I'm trying to present.If your reason is that crops "absorb" CO2, then your not really reducing greenhouse emissions, since both ethanol and hydrocarbons combust to form CO2. So the CO2 in either case will be "absorbed" by the plants.
I think the idea that your trying to present is the net CO2 released into the atmosphere will be less than burning fossil fuels by ethanol since CO2 is released when fermenting glucose->ethanol + released from combustion, but is recycled by plants for photosynthesis.
Still a dodgy reason, since why do we even have a greenhouse problem if plants can just take all the CO2 from the atmosphere. HSC still accepts it though.
carbon neutralIs there another way to word this more properly because this is the idea I'm trying to present.
I meant as in wording the advantage more clearly in a sentence.carbon neutral
Ethanol is considered carbon-neutral. This is because as it burns it produces water and carbon dioxide. This carbon dioxide is then used in plants for photosynthesis and ultimately forms glucose. Therefore since glucose is used for fermentation to make ethanol again, ethanol is carbon-neutral.I meant as in wording the advantage more clearly in a sentence.
Making or resulting in no net release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, especially as a result of carbon offsetting.Alot of you are misusing words like "hence," "since," "because" etc.
I'm not sure what "carbon neutral" means aswell...
"Another advantage to using ethanol as a fuel would be that it's overall CO2 emissions is minimal compared to petroleum as much of it is theoretically recycled by plants and used in photosynthetic reactions."I meant as in wording the advantage more clearly in a sentence.
Never heard of any of those expressions, but if you know it's been accepted in the past, go ahead and use them.Making or resulting in no net release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, especially as a result of carbon offsetting.
Ive seen them in many past papers and even questions ask : "Explain how ethanol can be considered carbon-neutral."Never heard of any of those expressions, but if you know it's been accepted in the past, go ahead and use them.