• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

So you literally have no choice but to stare at the question until you see reverse quotient rule?
...
Wow
...
If there were bounds we may have been able to do something else but since it doesnt i wouldn't see any other way...
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

So you literally have no choice but to stare at the question until you see reverse quotient rule?
...
Wow
...
Whenever you see something squared on the denominator of the integrand, you should be thinking of the reverse quotient rule (especially if it's an indefinite integral).
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Whenever you see something squared on the denominator of the integrand, you should be thinking of the reverse quotient rule (especially if it's an indefinite integral).
That wasn't the hard part. The hard part was realising that the product rule got sandwiched in like that, and that a +sinxcosx-sinxcosx was needed. The Pythagorean identity was not bad I suppose.
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
463
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon






 
Last edited:

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Experimenting with latex - so this could be rubbish:

 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Was in the process, but full working:


When doing that recurrence relation, it is a little bit slicker if you start with I_n + I_(n-2).
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

When doing that recurrence relation, it is a little bit slicker if you start with I_n + I_(n-2).
Touche, forgot about that
_______________________






Got too lazy from there. Clearly A = 1/sqrt(6) though.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Wolfram Integrator confirms 1/√6
yep, i did it on paper and got the correct answer.
hint: differentiation is much faster than integration for that problem.
Next problem:
evaluate:

Wolfram Alpha gives the answer in terms of elliptic integrals, but from my sources, an elementary solution definitely exists
 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

yep, i did it on paper and got the correct answer.
hint: differentiation is much faster than integration for that problem.
Next problem:
evaluate:

Wolfram Alpha gives the answer in terms of elliptic integrals, but from my sources, it can be done elementarily (is that even a word?).
If you have an apparently elementary solution, just differentiate it to check if it works.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

I got a way to do it but it takes waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay tooo long
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

If i can integrate id have the answer... Do you use partial fractions (x^2-2^(1/2)x+1)(x^2+2^(1/2)x +1)
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

If i can integrate id have the answer... Do you use partial fractions (x^2-2^(1/2)x+1)(x^2+2^(1/2)x +1)
yeah, that's a standard rational integral which can be decomposed into partial fractions. If I gave you the answer, do you think you might be able to spot a trick by differentiating it?
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

yeah, that's a standard rational integral which can be decomposed into partial fractions. If I gave you the answer, do you think you might be able to spot a trick by differentiating it?
Hmmm maybe but for now heres my working out :









 
Last edited:

nightweaver066

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
1,585
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

yep, i did it on paper and got the correct answer.
hint: differentiation is much faster than integration for that problem.
Next problem:
evaluate:

Wolfram Alpha gives the answer in terms of elliptic integrals, but from my sources, an elementary solution definitely exists
Pretty ugly. You can use and for each integral respectively.

Simplify etc. etc. Then use to end up with something like which we can quickly decompose (using our best mate the Heaviside Cover-Up Method), integrate, then get rid of our substitutions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top