• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

MODERN HISTORY ESSAY HELP Weimar Germany (1 Viewer)

jiggybufff

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Weimar Germany

I have an essay due on the topic "To what extent did weaknesses in the Weimar Republic account for the growth and rise of the Nazi Party in 1933?" does anyone have any notes or points on this?

THANKS :)
 

BandSixFix

Disillusioned
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
1,510
Gender
Female
HSC
2016
What weaknesses did the Weimar Republic have?
- Faults in the democratic system -> Germany was never used to this sort of system yet they were forced upon it -> inability to sustain democratic traditions led to the rising use of "Article 48" that undermined the constitution by ruling by decree -> this very system was used up until Hitler's appointment made by back-room deals by conservative elites.

- Could maybe talk about weaknesses attributed as a result of "Proportional representation" -> this lead to increased political instability as it allowed multiple parties to hold seats -> polarized the voting system allowing extreme left-wing and right-wing parties to be considered in times of economic, social, and political distress.
- Could also talk about the Wiemar Republics inability to control the army and thus letting it operate as "a state within a state" -> could also talk about the Kapp Putsch and then link the Ebert-Groner Pact into it -> this all led to Hitler being able to influence the army into adopting Nazi ideals -> Freikorps etc.
- The Wiemar Republic did not appeal to all class structures as well as Hitler did -> Propaganda was used by Hitler to appeal to all classes and ages of the German people that turned to him when the Republic was experiencing times of distress.
 

MBTMaster

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
35
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
"Proportional representation" -> this lead to increased political instability as it allowed multiple parties to hold seats -> polarized the voting system allowing extreme left-wing and right-wing parties to be considered in times of economic, social, and political distress
You have to be very careful with the proportional representation argument.

I wouldn't say that the proportional representation led directly to the political instability. Proportional representation is of course successful in Germany today. What it did do was, in a sense, fail to dampen the electoral position of the extreme right and left parties. The Australian and British first-past-the-post system results in larger parties dominating the political environment and allows them to gain majorities of seats without the majority of voters on side, thus dampening the effects of a fractured political environment. The German system did not have this "buffer" that reduced the impact of small parties making the system more susceptible.

To surmise I would say that the proportional system failed to take a leash and reduce the fractured political environment, therefore in a sense contributing in a secondary fashion to the Weimar Republic's instability.
 
Last edited:

BandSixFix

Disillusioned
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
1,510
Gender
Female
HSC
2016
You have to be very careful with the proportional representation argument.

I wouldn't say that the proportional representation led directly to the political instability. Proportional representation is of course successful in Germany today. What it did do was, in a sense, fail to dampen the electoral position of the extreme right and left parties. The Australian and British first-past-the-post system results in larger parties dominating the political environment and allows them to gain majorities of seats without the majority of voters on side, thus dampening the effects of a fractured political environment. The German system did not have this "buffer" that reduced the impact of small parties making the system more susceptible.

To surmise I would say that the proportional system failed to take a leash and reduce the fractured political environment, therefore in a sense contributing in a secondary fashion to the Weimar Republic's instability.
Well yeah - it did not lead directly to political instability but merely opened up circumstances in which politcal weakness could grow.
 

MBTMaster

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
35
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
I would definitely mention proportional representation but it cant really stand alone.

Another semi-myth is the whole 'Germans hated democracy,' trope. The Reichstag existed before WWI and has links all the way back to the Frankfurt parliament of 1848. The fact of the matter is that Germans (at least German men) were used to, if not democracy, regular elections and voting. It in no sense took Germans off guard and there isn't much reason to suspect they instinctively recoiled after its expansion following Versailles. It is true that at some points the public became disillusioned with the system and longed for a 'Kaiser-esque' figure.

But perspectives that conclude that Germany wasn't used to democracy and instinctively distrusted and disliked it aren't based in the facts.
 

chiddyfield

New Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2015
Messages
7
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
I would definitely mention proportional representation but it cant really stand alone.

Another semi-myth is the whole 'Germans hated democracy,' trope. The Reichstag existed before WWI and has links all the way back to the Frankfurt parliament of 1848. The fact of the matter is that Germans (at least German men) were used to, if not democracy, regular elections and voting. It in no sense took Germans off guard and there isn't much reason to suspect they instinctively recoiled after its expansion following Versailles. It is true that at some points the public became disillusioned with the system and longed for a 'Kaiser-esque' figure.

But perspectives that conclude that Germany wasn't used to democracy and instinctively distrusted and disliked it aren't based in the facts.
I'm actually quite interested in what you're saying, and I do to an extent believe what your saying after thinking about it. I think it was more the transition that democracy ushered in, rather than the democratic elements itself. Democracy eroded at the traditional values of Germany in the post war period as there was no longer a judicial consequence for acting in a contrary way.

For example, in pre-WWI Germany, acts of expressionism (particularly the obscene sexuality) would have been punishable by death. In post-war Germany though, the constitutional freedoms allowed a deviation from traditional values and morals.

Even more, considering that the conservative right seized the majority of the governmental-functional bodies after the Sparticist uprising suggests that 'they' may have been able to feed lies of this erosion and amplify it in a negative connotation.
 

meDAawesome

Active Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
200
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Another big weakness in the Weimar Republic is the split in the left. After the Spartacist Uprising and the SPD called upon the Freikorp to put it down, this resulted in a split in the parties of the left. The KPD and SPD would never work together again because of it, allowing the Nazis to rise up unopposed, where as if the parties of the left had worked together they might have been able to stop the Nazis.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top