Most of this was me. I did the door too. I kind bullshitted my way through and said that it was so boundless that it can involve intellectual and emotional.
Since I winged my creative I loved the creative stimulus's [emoji14]
Yea, I think the guy thats #1 in english would've done good though because hes a fast writer, didn't really get a chance to talk to him. If I wrote fast enough I think it was fine, but im not really sure what was even in the picture I used! what the fuck were the seats looking at? thats the most retarded locale I've ever seen and it was the only one I could think of somewhat literally being present in somewhat of my creative.
For the Door I hope my argument wasnt too wordy. But basically I said as Holub portrays discovery to always have some ramifications/transform individuals in some way etc. it hence indicates that through discovery emotional and intellectual development can be achieved (not exact words I cant remember lmao because this sentence makes 0 sense that was just my argument). Also the unknown evokes emotions or some shit like that.
Ya I did bullshit but I think the argument somewhat works. It all depends on the marker I guess, because even though I think my creative was decent it pales to my prescribed. Many people I know however had way shorter ORT like 30% of the essay or even worse in their AOS essay and did fine, even I did in my CSSA trial (got 14/15).
I will be shocked if i get anything below 35/36 (not that I can tell) so I think my mark wont be effected TOO badly and maybe I can still get a low band 6. will just have to do good in modules (hopefully not weird/curveballs like this paper)