Yes, you do need to find an interval to use the IVT for [R]. But since the question just specifies that at least one root must exist, nobody is going to care what interval you pick. You just have to pick any interval that works.
Ok so I got the first part with IVT as you suggested,[R] Requires IVT (not hard).
[H] Write the polynomial as: p3(x) = p2(x) + x3/3!. Then use previous part and calculus (monotonicity) to argue that p3 has exactly one root.
How would you know whether to use IVT or MVT? I think I'm kind of confused over thatYes, you do need to find an interval to use the IVT for [R]. But since the question just specifies that at least one root must exist, nobody is going to care what interval you pick. You just have to pick any interval that works.
[H] is different because you're trying to prove that no root exists. Hint: Think 2U, because you're given a quadratic.
You can then use what He-Mann suggested.
Ok so I got the first part with IVT as you suggested,
with the second part, I concluded that p2(x) has only one stationery point (-1,-1/2) and its concave up, hence it can't ever touch the x axis. So can you just say because p2(x) is always positive, p3(x) can only have one root?
For startersHow would you know whether to use IVT or MVT? I think I'm kind of confused over that
I'll keep that in mindFor starters
The IVT is related to f
The MVT is related to f'
Whilst obvious, this saved me a bit of thinking a few times.
Perhaps more clearly, very rarely do you ever use the MVT to show the existence of the root. The IVT wants you to examine the actual function values, so it's the more suitable one. The MVT is considering the gradient.
Let u = 1/x and see what happens when you find the limit.View attachment 33904
i can't use l'hopital's rule for this can I? How am I meant to know what sin(1/x) even looks like in the first place?
View attachment 33904
i can't use l'hopital's rule for this can I? How am I meant to know what sin(1/x) even looks like in the first place?
Wait I'm kind of confused, after you rewrite the function, do you use l'hopital's rule on it? or do you just know that it tends to one (?)
Wait I'm kind of confused, after you rewrite the function, do you use l'hopital's rule on it? or do you just know that it tends to one (?)
Wait never mind, I kind of get it in my head but I don't know how to write the working out formally
The question was to simplify the expression.
The question was to simplify the expression.
are you subtracting x from 180 degrees because the range of the the sine inverse function is restricted to between -90 and 90 degrees?
i dont think I really understand this
i dont think I really understand this
would guess -(Pi-x)??