SameDecent but rushed reflection.
Hope so, I did the same because I wrote a discursive...Do you think it's OK if I also used the excerpt as a stimulus :/ for Mod C
It did - I did continue it but I also referred to it as a stimulus in my reflection. My gosh.Hope so, I did the same because I wrote a discursive...
did it say continue from the excerpt?
Ohhhh crapppIt did - I did continue it but I also referred to it as a stimulus in my reflection. My gosh.
That is true. But since I also used it as a stimulus....I explained how it connected....Ohhhh crappp
Hope they won't be too harsh......
Did you even have to refer to it for part b, because it asked you to explain something about emotive language iirc
I think you'll be fine since you continued from it, and I reckon it's fine to talk about its connection in part b)That is true. But since I also used it as a stimulus....I explained how it connected....
My god.
I added my title like similar to spotty handed my prescribed text but my point was I added it in my discursive as a speech after I referred to the book in the excerpt that alters the man as the title of mine so bullshitted it to get it like my prepared response lolAnyone remember the actual question for mod c (advanced)? Lots of people seem to be worrying that they didn't add titles but I though we were continuing the excerpt and thus did not need a title (not to mention I didn't even know we generally need title in the first place)?