• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

2Arg(z+1) = arg(z) (1 Viewer)

uart

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
69
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Note that the lines from O to 1, from O to z and from z to z+1 form a parallelogram rhombus. The result follows immediately from the parellelogram rhombus property that the diagonals bisect the corner angles.
 
Last edited:

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
445
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
This question was extremely easy under the old syllabus, as the following circle geometry theorem was part of the course.

If AB is a chord of a circle, centred at O, then the angle at the centre of the circle standing on that arc is twice the angle at the circumference on the same arc.

In other words, if C is any point on major arc AB of the circle, then angle AOB is exactly twice angle ACB.

Applied to this case, arg (z) corresponds to angle AOB and arg (z + 1) corresponds to angle ACB, with A being at z = 1 and B representing z.

Does this question come from an older source? The question can be done without the circle geometry, but using circle geometry is the easiest approach.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Note that the lines from O to 1, from O to z and from z to z+1 form a parallelogram. The result follows immediately from the parellelogram property that the diagonals bisect the corner angles.
This reasoning is incorrect. You should point out that the quadrilateral so formed is a rhombus (all 4 sides equal, in this case = 1), whose diagonals bisect the angles of the rhombus. In general, diagonals of a parallelogram do not bisect their incident angles.
 
Last edited:

uart

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
69
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Yes you're correct, you need to show a rhombus specifically for the angle bisect property. Sorry, I deleted that quoted post just before reading your reply and was about to acknowlege the correction.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top