eternallyboreduser
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2023
- Messages
- 548
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
This is for the case where , in which case we have shown that there is a maximum turning point at coordinatesIm a bitView attachment 41882 confused with this part
I have seen this exact result in an MX2 assignment, though it was meant to be done by induction - this is actually a nicer approach.Also @Luukas.2 do you think questions like this would appear in selective school exams or would they be too overboard? Like would qs of such difficulty appear often in hsc exams besides like the last q. This was in my year 10 hw btw for tutoring and was one of the challenging (optional) qs.
Yeah ik how to get to x=c/2 since i could solve part a but do u mind explaining how u arrived at y<2(c/2)^kThis is for the case where , in which case we have shown that there is a maximum turning point at coordinates
There are no other stationary points on the curve as the derivative
can only be zero if (which never happens) or if
The only solution if the fraction equals +1 is
And -1 is only a solution if is an even integer (which it can't be in this case) and even then, the equation becomes and thus has no solution unless .
Thus, the function has exactly one stationary point, a maximum which is not only a local maximum, but in fact the global maximum. Hence, the function must satisfy the inequation
I was showing not only that x = c/2 is a stationary point, but also that there are no other stationary points.Yeah ik how to get to x=c/2 since i could solve part a but do u mind explaining how u arrived at y<2(c/2)^k
OHHHH thats what you were trying to say okay it makes sense nowI was showing not only that x = c/2 is a stationary point, but also that there are no other stationary points.
Draw a set of coordinate axes. Mark on them the max at . Now draw a continuous curve that has that point as a maximum and has no other stationary points... So, it must increase for and decrease for (consistent with the domain, which may be .
Look at the picture you've drawn. Is there any possible curve that has those properties and for which the turning point is not also the global maximum (i.e. the point on the curve with the largest y value)? Hence, for all points on the curve, the y value must be less than or equal to the y value of the stationary point.
Does this make sense?
Or, load up desmos, put in (say) and try different values of . All will have a maximum at , and many will be restricted to the domain , though for values like the domain will be all reals. In every case, the height of the curve (y value) will always be at or below the value of the maximum turning point.
Yes, as I said, it's a form of reasoning that you might not be very familiar with yet, but you will use it from time to time going forwardsOHHHH thats what you were trying to say okay it makes sense now
Thank you for the help !!Yes, as I said, it's a form of reasoning that you might not be very familiar with yet, but you will use it from time to time going forwards
And it is needed for most of the questions you posted, FYI.
You would just find the y value and nature of the stationary point of y= a + 1/a right for the given domainAnother question like this would be:
Pretty much, though this uses the reasoning mentioned above and would actually be at Advanced level. This is a result that appears at the start of plenty of MX2 questions, and which can be done without calculus... so I think it is useful to know. It can also be extended into other problems, like the minimum of , or finding if is given.You would just find the y value and nature of the stationary point of y= a + 1/a right for the given domain