Wait so then how does that work with other schools where their internals are much harder? Like if some schools have easier internals, how do they like balance it out with other schools
thats the whole point of moderation for hsc marks. they use your internal rank to describe your performance within the cohort instead of using your actual internal mark, bc all internals are made the same. so having easier internal tasks is not beneficial for your hsc marks or your atar necessarily, its actually more harmful bc you will get a serious overestimate of your performance in the hsc. i highly suggest watching this video bc it helps you understand how you end up with whatever hsc mark you get:
it can be beneficial to have early entry to have easier assessment tasks in y11 but you have to think about it this way: if unis cared about their future students having outstanding academic performance they would not offer early entry in the first place, take medicine for example that doesnt and probably never will offer early entry. some courses just dont require high academic performance and thats okay. let people that get early entry live a little, if they were really that dumb they will drop out of uni on their own
it is very hard to even get 90%+ in anything unless ur literally an actual genius in subjects like english and even modern to an extent in my school, let alone without sweating ur balls off.
maybe your school is bad at english or modern or some shit? sure i get it some subjects are hard to band 6 but they are not impossible, if your cohort is struggling that hard to make a 90 in english, especially eng adv id suggest tutoring.
ppl in baulko, nsg, nsb, ruse can do it, and they dont bitch about kids from lower ranking schools having inflated grades bc they are too busy acing the hsc. you don't put people down unless you want to pull yourself up
