Search results

damn bio doesn't scale great in the first place but damn the scaling of the subjects you do is ass, maybe don't drop bio and drop one of the subjects with proper horrible scaling.

without a required LOBF tho

sig figs are more or less irrelevant in physics and matter a lot more in chem its just good practice and is never really marked for

thanks you the goat fr

no

surely

lad i think penrith is quite a bit more poisonous

you have to link his discovery of the germ theory to the swan neck flask experiment, you will get the analysis marks but not the links

yep but I would only use it within a response not as your final answer, for your final answer as a molecule id say to stick to structural

just try and learn a real skill, if it was that easy everyone would do it

dropshipping made money back in like 2020 its hella oversaturated now

haha what an oxymoron

its not they will just mark harsher and harsher until they get their desired distribution

I rate the pfp

🤣 55 and active on a study forum is some insane work

it will be accepted anything with a frequency of UV or higher will be accepted

asking chatgpt is not the way to go brother, and it will definitely be accepted since people do agriculturally farm sugar cane

it is impossible to predict your bio raw mark besides multis since the marking criteria will just become stricter and stricter until they have a suitable distribution which is quite unpredictable for us so you cannot assume you got 100% on all the questions you did not definitely lose marks on...

that is what it means atar wise

hoping for a hard spectroscopy 7 marker at the end