Search results

here's a fun one from our assignment in T4: it can be done fairly straightforward algebraically as well, but suppose the question asks for a geometric proof... enjoy :)

honestly yeah when i see (i) evaluate z+w (ii) evaluate zw it’s just way too difficult for me

ah right… I guess they probably try and make the questions of similar difficulty across the exams for apartheid the 12 and 8 markers were kinda weird, but I just content dumped lmao so it should be ok rip my schools scaling lmao, I’m 1st internal and I barely studied for modern because I have...

i thought the apartheid questions were really questionable to be honest… do they scale the marks according to the elective?

ur too good

anyone have last minute predictions for coe?

past papers past papers past papers and cambridge enrichment qs

that was part of my analysis, and I, just like the people in your class are probably justifying it because it was all we had prepared, but I do think it was actually necessary, because in terms of the 'collisions' and the discussion of 'good servant' and 'bad servant' seemed to imply Caliban...

basically same approach i took - made sure to quote it way too many times haha

I do tempest and hagseed too - I just focalised the metatheatrical discussion and the idea of “servile” characters they gave- no specific analysis on Ariel prepared.

yeah the mod A and B questions were quite straightforward I thought… and the human experiences we experienced in mod C seemed to just want you talk about storytelling in the imaginative/discursive

thoughts on them accidentally including part of the common mod paper in mod C?

I think generally you're supposed to show how the quote is representative of broader literary forms and features throughout the text, and extend a more detailed analysis of the kind of 'theme' it associates to. edit: don't talk explicitly 'the quote is representative of...' just make the...

metafiction; can be adapted to different forms and importantly, fits the essence of the module as 'craft of writing' so almost every question has an entry point for this type of writing.

fr modern is doomed i'm in denial until after paper 2

yeah, you’ll be good- they might even prefer you just discuss it rather than just name dropping the arbitrary “dramatic features”

i spent a good two minutes figuring it out LOL

yeah, that seemed like the trap to me as well - I made sure to frame every argument with how he used the dramatic experience to motivate his characters emotions in the denigrating context etc

Mine was on how dramatic representations of naive political emotions allow us a microcosm of the real world, which is authorially manipulated for the purposes of self reflection and ideologistic reappraisal… and of course some mundane parts addressing the “how” of the question with respect to...

mm the lexical contrasts between the normalised urban environment and vivid vignettes of natural beauty