Search results

i respect the hustle and ill let them know

the philosophy exam seems very interesting, would be a strange one to study for

no, do you do tutoring nearby?

you are awfully close to my school haha

what was your thought process behind that u-sub?

:oops:

\text{Proof that } E=mc^2\\\\Power=\frac{Energy}{Time}\implies Pt=E\\E=Pt\\\text{Given that }s=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2\implies \frac{1}{2}at^2+ut-s=0\\\\\implies t=\frac{-u+\sqrt{u^2-4(\frac{1}{2}a)(-s)}}{a}\text{ (Assuming initial velocity is positive)}\\\\\implies...

in my experience going with a gut feeling is usually the best decision when faced with 2 options, so i would personally keep legal

good luck carrotsss get some rest :sleep:

of course it would be helpful, but you would obviously have to supplement study with past papers as well

from my point of view it looks like you want to keep legal over science ext. the pros of dropping science ext seem to outweigh the cons of dropping science ext. what made you set on dropping legal studies during prelims though? is that still an issue?

if i had to choose one i would do past papers. but ive never done dr du

bros tryna get that 99.95 RoSA 💀💀

it's B. I have never taken chemistry but i got a real good feeling about this

i got y=x^2 -3x +4 for that question dont remember what option that was

is that meant to say 2theta instead of 20?

for f(x) = 0, we have the equation x^4 -8x^2 +11 = 0 we can notice that x^4 is the same as (x^2)^2 by power laws so we actually have a hidden quadratic in this equation of degree 4, and if we replace x^2 with 'u' , this means that x^4 = u^2 , and 8x^2 is 8u. we can then use the quadratic formula...