Search results

Re: Geography Exam was reasonable/easy. Expecting at least 85+ raw.

Compared to other years, agreed. The second page was OK... some of the stuff on the first page though, ugh. I think I did OK overall in it though. Hoping to scrape by with a 20/25.

52/70 I'll take that. What will that align to considering the difficulty level of this years paper? (Idk if it was considered easy or hard... I didn't prepare much. Smashed everything up until Q16..... 4/15 -.-)

Literally would have gotten 90/100 raw easily if I just took a deep breath before and reading the questions properly. I lost marks in Q11!! :( Oh well haha lets just wait and see what happens, it's done now, there's no changing it. Be glad it's over!

Topped every single test in Semester 2... overall rank second, and topped the CSSA trial. (2nd because I had some pretty serious family issues for the first half of the year, so I literally didn't study/do homework or anything) So I think my assessment mark is decent...

Revised my estimate to 80/100.... (Very confident that it will be my raw mark, unless the markers are generous, in which case ~+3) Do you guys reckon I'll scrape through for a B6? Literally lost 10 marks from being a complete retard and making the silliest mistakes of my life. Far out. ;_;

Woohoo I got the same answer for part v)... maybe 1/3 for part iv) Embarrassing that I did better in Q16 than Q15.

Your mark needs to be aligned based on the difficulty of the subject first, doesn't it? I may be wrong.

Would I get 1/2 if I had -2/3 because I think I fudged m>2 like another poster.

What about -2/3?

Yes. "Find the exact length of the interval CD"

sqrt(450) for the length of CD What did you guys get for the minimum distance of the two cars?

78

Can you explain how you got to that? (Mind you, I took a complete guess)

Judging by past years and the way Mathematics has aligned... I think above 80 should be pretty sweet for a band 6. (Source: ULTIMATE RAW MARKS DATABASE v2.0)

I couldn't get iv) although in hindsight I think I have an idea of how to do it but I may have gotten part v)

One of the harder papers in the last few years IMO. ~85/100 raw I think. (Perhaps subtract some silly mistakes from below) If I had to estimate.... 9/10 MC 13/15 Q11 (embarrassing mistake on the log integration) 15/15 Q12 15/15 Q13 12/15 Q14 (Maybe 13, was d) a=3???) 11/15 Q15 10/15 Q16...

Lets hope so....

Agreed. I'm feeling less and less confident the more I read about the stuff that I didn't include in my arguments, (Because I studied so much stuff that in hindsight was irrelevant) compounded by my mediocre Riefenstahl response.... ugh ;_;

Thank fuck I wasn't the only one who struggled for Leni question b.... that's the only section I feel like I flunked. Edit: I know there was a lot of stuff I could have talked about, I got 13/15 for the trial and the question was really similar - missed out a heap of the stuff i mentioned in...